Cigar Specifications
Brand / Line:
Acid
Cigar Name:
Liquid
Shape:
Robusto
Country of Origin:
Nicaragua
Size:
56 x 6
Wrapper:
Cameroon
Status:
Active
0 Recent Reviews
None yetNo recent reviews yet — be the first!
32 Archival Reviews
Show ↓📜 Archival Review
March 4, 2026
"Acid"
Different! Good looking, a lot of smoke. Would try again.
📜 Archival Review
November 25, 2008
"Acid's best? Maybe."
I have tried just about all of the Acids now, and I have to admit I am not a big fan of flavored cigars in general. To me all the Acids pretty much taste the same, basically it's like smoking flowers that were dipped in sugar. However the Liquid is sort of different. Like most of Drew's stuff it's hard to describe, but the first thing you will note is it is very strong. This is by far the strongest cigar in Acid's lines from what I've tried. Sort of has a pungent perfume like aroma to it; that's the best way I can describe it. The wrapper is not sugar dipped like a lot of the Acids. I could see a lot of people not liking this cigar, but it's the only Acid I like. Just be prepared 'cause it doesnt taste like the blue or purple lines you may have tried.
📜 Archival Review
January 20, 2008
"so so"
not great even by acid standards which i dont expect that much from
📜 Archival Review
November 20, 2007
"Good for Me!"
The Liquid flows and it was smooooooth! Why all the bad reviews? Some people who think of themselves as cigar prueist don't want to admit they like Acid? Well the Liquid is a well built cigar that taste sweet and spicy at the same time, deal with it!
📜 Archival Review
August 22, 2007
"I like Acid, I HATE this cigar"
I love the Kuba Kuba, Blondie, and Roam. This one was highly recommended, so I looked forward to giving it a shot. From the first draw I was DISGUSTED! Right off the bat it was OVERLY HARSH, and it never quit! Aroma was nice but the taste was atrocious. Never again!
📜 Archival Review
August 7, 2007
"Dreadful"
My wife bought me a few of these as a gift. Mental note,… Don’t let wife buy cigar. AT first I figured why not. She has picked out some good ones in the past. This baby has veered me away from flavored sticks. The smell of this should have given me a clue. I could not finish it. I was even foolish enough to give this one another try after a few months rest in the humidor. All I can say is the remaining few were trashed. Not good enough to be gifted. Appearance was deceiving and flovor did not deliver. I still LOVE my wife!!!
📜 Archival Review
July 18, 2007
"Pleasantly Surprised....."
This cigar’s construction is fantastic. Very smooth and soft. I really enjoyed the way this cigar smelled. It was spicy and nutty. The cigar burned perfectly, was very mild and full of flavorful. This was spicy, nutty and woody. This would be a great every day cigar. This was the first ACID cigar I have smoked and I was very pleased. Awesome cigar for this price. I enjoyed this and look forward to the next time I smoke one.
📜 Archival Review
May 11, 2007
"This thing tastes like ....*#@%"
Where to begin? Let’s start here. If offered, as I was, a chance to FOR FREE, taste one of these sticks by all means do so. But make yourself a promise NOT to get angry at the bearer of the gift...I'm sure they didn't mean anything by it. If you are asked to actually BUY one of these……call a cop.
One things is for sure, I’ll never forget the experience!
One things is for sure, I’ll never forget the experience!
📜 Archival Review
November 6, 2006
"When I catch that dog..."
Someone I thought was a friend gave me one of these. It looks nice, and has a smooth leathery feel, soft sheen, on the firm side without any soft or hard spots. Appears to be a fairly well made cigar. The scent of the unlit cigar made me sneeze, that should have been enough for me to trash it but I figured it can't be that bad. Coffee, cola and scotch have not been able to get the nasty taste of that thing out of my mouth. The fetid aroma of the burning stick has contaminated my home with an odor something like a fire in a Tibetan incense factory. The ash fell off before it got to be 1/2" long and putting it the ash tray to go out wasn't fast enough. I only wish flushing it down the toilet could have taken the stink and the after taste away as well. I started smoking cigars i.e. La Corona whiffs, Dutch Monsters and El Producto in the mid 70's. While over seas in the 80's I was introduced to cigars like Punch, Montecristo (#2 being my favorite & #1 a close second) and Romeo Y Julieta (thus ending my days of enjoying machine made cigars). In the 90's, Hoya de Nicaragua became my all time favorite non-cuban cigar here in the states. The point of this you wonder? ~ In 30+ years of smoking cigars, this is without a doubt the worst cigar I have ever lit. It may have just been this one cigar, I'll never know.
📜 Archival Review
August 4, 2006
"not good"
I really cant say i liked this at all. The flavor was a very nutty taste that turned to crap. I wish i hadnt wasted my $6 on this one.
📜 Archival Review
June 16, 2006
"yuk"
no! construction problems, but the flavor was better.
📜 Archival Review
February 26, 2006
"So so..."
Better than the Nasty, I'd probably place the Liquid in the range of the Kuba Kuba or Roam. Not a perfect smoke, but might be worth another try on a random day. The flavor was very inconsistent....started sweet, turned sour, turned nutty, back to sour, back to vaguely sweet. It lit well and the pigtail tore nicely for a great non-cut draw. Still though, there's better Acids out there for you to try.
📜 Archival Review
January 29, 2006
"Good Smoke"
I tred the Kuba and the Liquid back to back. The Kuba won but the Liquid is still a good cigar. Liquid has more flavored components than the Kuba, which ain't bad, just different. Some have said it smells like a french whorehouse and tastes the same...I agree the floral smell is strong but the smoking flavor is really nice...but if you don't like the smell don't smoke the cigar.
📜 Archival Review
September 30, 2005
"Too Perfumey"
The aroma if this cigar is very strong and pervasive. It was recommended to me by my local tobacconist as an acceptable smoke that’s not offensive to the nose of the fairer sex. He was right on both counts. The flavor of the cigar is acceptable, and the smoke was less objectionable to my girlfriend, however I couldn’t get paste the aroma. The stick smelled like the kind of cheap perfume the French douse themselves in to mask their month old B.O. If you decide to purchase these, I HIGHLY recommend either purchasing a humibag, or other small cheap humidore to store them in, otherwise the aroma will taint all the other sticks in your humi. I TRIPLE bagged this stick, but after only a few days my entire humidore smelled like perfume.
📜 Archival Review
August 31, 2005
"Proud to have liked it"
Beats the fool out of the Griffin's Fuente Robusto that I just smoked. Yeah, I liked it, alot! I would order a box and be very pleased with the purchase. Wish the sampler would have been full of this beauty. Smoked it to the nub while the steaks rested.
📜 Archival Review
June 28, 2005
"What a dog rocket!"
Got this in a sampler. All I can say is, thank God I didn't purchase more of these. This thing had the most god-awful reek of any cigar I've ever smelled. The taste was even worse. Imagine smoking a Hall's Menthyllyptus cough drop beacuse that's got to be pretty close.
📜 Archival Review
June 25, 2005
"Huh?"
Gifted one of these, and it was THE most flavorless cigar I've ever smoked. Slight hint of the crummy Kuba Kuba flavor, with smoke that was listless and dull...wouldn't smoke another of these if you paid me.
📜 Archival Review
June 23, 2005
"The Best"
The Liquid is my fave of the Acid Line. Easy to see how it becomes the "Hate it or Love it" of Cigars! Not your Grandpa's Stogie for sure. Great Draw, Smooth Wrapper. I love the herbal taste to the tobacco! One of my Favorite Cigars! Wish I could afford a BOX!
📜 Archival Review
May 6, 2005
"just crap"
I thought it was just me and this perfume taste. I got 2 lit one put it right away and threw the other away. WOULDN'T EVEN GIVE THIS ONE AWAY YUK!!!!!
📜 Archival Review
November 30, 2004
"Well....."
I got one of these because I wanted to try something in the Acid line, I've heard good or bad things about them. Well, I guess I'm firmly in the "shit, not something interesting" bandwagon. In fact, I'm pretty sure a rolled up dried cow patty would be more enjoyable than this smoke. I tried to get through this one but didn't make it half way before I tossed it and ran to brush my teeth. A resounding YUK.
📜 Archival Review
July 9, 2004
"Smells like teen hippies"
I figured what the hell, I'll try it! It smelled of hippies donning on that pachuli crap or however you spell it. It had a decent appearance, nice pigtail cap, and overlapped foot. Lite it up, the wrapper has this intense flavor or crap! It's like I just sucked on the tip of some hippie perfume. I dealt with it for a bit, smoked it about half way and it was either toss it out or jump over a bridge for smoking this. If your married, don't smoke this, your wife will think you were out with some wacko hooker. Put a booth up at a Phish concert, you'll do well with these! Females might like them, but I think that's still a stretch. Just say no to this one!
📜 Archival Review
June 16, 2004
"Not Bad"
Good draw, nice flavor. If your not into "spicy" you will not like it. If you are daring I would opt for the Kuba Kuba or Blondie from Acid. They are a smoother smoke.
📜 Archival Review
June 14, 2004
"amusing smoke"
The wife liked the aroma, I liked the taste. An easy draw, even burn, consistant "tropical spice" flavor start to finish.
📜 Archival Review
June 13, 2004
"Yuck!!"
This thing SUCKED!!! Enough said...
📜 Archival Review
June 8, 2004
"The worst smoke I ever had"
I could not bring myself to smoke this more than a minute or so just to see if it changed. The best way to picture smoking this would be to compare it to drinking perfume. I think the comparison to smoking an air freshner from another reviewer is also on the mark.
📜 Archival Review
March 4, 2004
"Smelled bad unlit..."
Was still bad when I lit it. Felt like I was smoking an air freshener. I couldn't bring myself to finish this. I guess you either love it or you hate it, and I hated it.
📜 Archival Review
February 23, 2004
"good for the potpuri bowl...."
but not smoking! Another stinky loser, thank god it was for free!
📜 Archival Review
November 6, 2003
"WHOA!"
I really love Drew Estates Cigars, but out of all of the one I have tried, this is my least favorite so far! It is was too perfumey(If that is a word). It is kinda like pouring a bottle of French Perfume down your throat and everyone knows the french SUCK!!!
📜 Archival Review
May 14, 2002
"Pre-lit aroma"
Pre-lit aroma is a very unique "earthy cologne" scent.
📜 Archival Review
May 9, 2002
"Worth the smell..."
Opening the box all but burns your eyes, but as soon as the first puff is taken, the smooth taste makes up for the initial pain. Lots of smoke. Keep the box closed, and don't mix w/ others in your humidor! it's POTENT!
📜 Archival Review
August 31, 2000
At first glance the cigar looked to be a new aged wannabe smoke, I was wrong. The smell of the cigar almost made me sick at first due to it's herbal, and incense smell. the aroma it let off was all but sick, but vary pleasent... not overwhelming as expected. the tast was a whole new experance. dont buy a box, just order one, and see what you think... i love it as do others, but there are those that would rather smoke an incense stick
📜 Archival Review
March 12, 2000
Very good cigar, Smoked two then bought a box.
Add Your Review
Share your experience with this cigar. All reviews are moderated before appearing on the site.