Acid Roam

This was my first cigar, and at first thats why i thought it was so good, but after having many other cigars it is sitll one of my favorites. Has a great taste, burns slow, and gives a nice mellow buzz.

This is the second Acid that I have tried and I thought the Blondie was much better.

This is the second of Acid's Purple line I have had. I originally was not very impressed with the C-Note, although I have found that after some time in a humidor they make for VERY enjoyable superquick smokes. They're still no blondie, but they're good. The Roam's a bit tougher to get behind. I had it in the humi for quite some time. It's aroma is delectable to be sure. The wrapper is quite tasty...faintly sweet. Pleasant. The smoke itself lacks the kind of flavor I look for in a good smoke though-- a tad bitter in that regard. This is a mammoth of a cigar which normally isn't my thing. It seems well put together though. Solid, lights easily, burns at a slightly fast pace for its size, chews well (in fact I had my end squished down to almost a wafer and it was still drawing impressively enough). If this had the flavor of an Acid Blue, it would be a rockin' smoke. As it does not, my reaction to it overall is tepid. So far, even mediocre Acids are still an enjoyable experience, but this will be a rare smoke for me.

Reasonably sweetish and with a nice lightly flowery overtone, but absolutely no other flavors. Bland. Blah. Disappointing. Roam elsewhere for a good cigar. Get it? HAHHAHAHA! Try the Kuba Kuba or Earthiness for a better smoke with some traditional cigar flavors, and at half the price.

my second favorite acid and great with a cup of coffee. the smell is great and its really mellow, try it.

Smooth tasting but very sweet. Ok for a change of pace.

I've tried a few of these. They're a bit too floral for my taste.

This was a gift from my Wife. I would not have pruchased something like this on my own if it hadn't been for her. Having said that, I must admit that this was a very nice cigar. It had a very good construction, draw was pretty good, burn was fairly even- I was impressed. Their is a very sweet taste on your lips at the beginning of the cigar which I deduced was from a sweet wax, perhaps, put on the cap to serve the dual function of holding down the cap and adding a distinctive taste. It became slightly bitter during the last 2". I would not call this an "aromatic" cigar because it smells like a lot of good smelling cigars i.e. Fuente 858, Padron 3000M. The smoke is not a pungent billow of incense which I understand some of the Lars Line resembles. I would have to recommend this cigar and see what others say upon trying one. I think that this is a very decent cigar.

Tried it with 3 different microbrews. Made them all taste
sweet. Wierd. Since i only smoke when i have a brew I
will pass on any more.

I love the blondie and was hoping this would be similar, but larger--so perhaps my opinion is tainted. However, even after experiencing the differences I was disappointed a tad. It's really sweet at first, then mellows, then kicks up a notch towards the finish. Long smoke. Slightly tough draw. Just doesn't have the 'spicy' uniqueness of other acids. Kind of boring for such a long smoke. But not terrible--just okay. I'm going to try again but am not really too anxious to...will grab a blondie instead

Mild, the cigar that made me understand "creamy" in descriptions. Good, but left a waxy feel in my mouth.

Very creamy smoke. If you like aromatic cigars and something different, this is a good Churchill smoke.

This is a cigar for the individual that likes aromatics . I think pipe smoker would find the acid line very rewarding. Very weel made cigars. A little too expensive for every day smoke.