Cigar Specifications
Brand / Line:
Rocky Patel Connecticut
Cigar Name:
Robusto
Shape:
Robusto
Country of Origin:
Dominican Republic
Size:
50 x 5.5
MSRP:
$6.50
Status:
Active
0 Recent Reviews
None yetNo recent reviews yet — be the first!
17 Archival Reviews
Show ↓📜 Archival Review
July 28, 2008
"They Differ"
They differ, oh Johnny, they differ. Over a year ago I reviewed this cigar and I said I would tell you if the others I bought differed. The previous cigar with age it was a very tasty, albeit mild stick. However, this cigar was from the same five-pack and it had very little flavor and the burn was not very accurate. I had another peviously this summer and it was the same as the recent log. Don't get me wrong these aren't horrible, they just have a range in flavor and construction. My advice, be cautious, basically it's a crapshoot.
📜 Archival Review
January 5, 2008
"Better than IT"
This is a better "standard" cigar than Rocky's Indian Tabac line. In fact, I like this far better. That said, this is a very plain, but well made cigar that mild cigar smokers will enjoy. These are pretty easy to fnd and not a bad deal. A decent everyday cigar.
📜 Archival Review
November 26, 2007
"solid"
Unbelievable construction with a firm ash. You only need to ash this once or twice. This cigar cannot be beat in the mild/mild-medium range at this price. Age them for a few months and the flavor goes from 8 to 10.
📜 Archival Review
November 14, 2007
"Good if way below retail"
Sorry, I have a hard time paying $75 for a box of mild Connecticut wrap cigars. HOWEVER, if you can get these on auction or on special for under $50 they are a fine smoke. Mild but tastey. Pretty typical for the blend, but a very nice morning cigar.
📜 Archival Review
August 9, 2007
"Not Rocky's best."
I'm a huge fan of Rocky's cigars but I feel I got 'burned' on this one. Actually I didn't, they were free with purchase of Fusions. Pre-light everything looks good...great appearance and construction but no aroma. Upon lighting there is a weird chemical taste that quickly goes away but is nearly unbearable until it does. Draw is too light and flavor is non-existant. Very average cigar, really below average considering the weird taste upon first light. A yard 'gar but I won't be acquiring more after their gone.
📜 Archival Review
July 19, 2007
"unenthusiastic..."
This mild-bodied cigar left me completely unsatisfied. Although the construction and appearance of the cigar were consistent with others in of the Rocky Patel line, the flavor was near non-existent. The pre-light aroma was more exciting than the lit cigar... Even as a big fan of mild-bodied cigars, it was hard for me to smoke this stick after the first third. Out of fairness to this board, I smoked to the 2/3 point and set it down out of sheer boredom. Not impressed...
📜 Archival Review
June 18, 2007
"Pleasant Surprise"
I received a sampler of these when I purchased some Fusions. I wasn't expecting too much but was pleasantly surprised when I fired the first one up. This is a very good cigar. The wrapper is wonderful and the construction. In fact, each vitola in the sampler was a thing of beauty. The burn was even producing a nice grey ash and the draw was easy. Taste is mild but with character throughout. This is a very nice smoke especially for a beginner or someone who enjoys a mild smoke in the morning. I highly recommend this Rocky--as I do almost all others.
📜 Archival Review
June 14, 2007
"Mild but flavorful"
The first RP Connecticut I smoked was like puffing on air, much too mild. I'm the first person to appreciate a mild cigar, but that first gar was as bland as they come. Fortunately, my second attempt was much better and I could taste the subtle flavors of the cigar in the first half. I had some "sippin whiskey" with the second half and it was an excellent match.
Since I bought a five-pack, I'll let you know it the last three differ.
Since I bought a five-pack, I'll let you know it the last three differ.
📜 Archival Review
April 3, 2007
"Very nice."
A mild bodied cigar with personality. Attractive, smokeable, well constructed, and very tasty. I usually go for medium to full bodied cigars but this cigar held my interest. Gorillas will eat this for breakfast. Newbies will enjoy this anytime. I had about 4 months of box time on this. Gifted to me by my buddy Glenn. Thank You Glenn. $4 for PP?
📜 Archival Review
January 14, 2007
"very good"
one of my favorites.smoke great
📜 Archival Review
December 3, 2006
"Gonna need more room"
It might just be me, but erery RP I try gets a permanent place in my humi - gonna need more room
Typical RP, great burn, construction and taste
Typical RP, great burn, construction and taste
📜 Archival Review
June 13, 2006
"Easy does it"
I think this is easily the lightest RP smoke I've had, and perhaps it was meant to be that way. A beautiful look to this cigar and the burn was typical, perfect 🙂
Subtle flavors and a mild, nutty flavor make this a winner. Good for the beginner or advanced smoker!
Subtle flavors and a mild, nutty flavor make this a winner. Good for the beginner or advanced smoker!
📜 Archival Review
June 6, 2006
"Vintage 1990"
Perfect draw, great construction and appearance but the best was the rich flavor that had a perfect strength.
📜 Archival Review
March 15, 2006
"Patel Conversion Tool"
I'm also not one to go for the mild-medium side, but I got these in an RP sampler from Cigars International, and I'm a believer. I wasn't quite as blown away by the wrapper as some other reviewers of these cigars: Mine all look just this far off of being seconds, patchy and a little raggedy, but the wrapper is smooth and lustrous, and I can imagine how other batches might be downright beautiful. I was actually very well constructed however. It burned slow and evenly with a firm ash that held on for about 2 inches. With loads of creamy smoke, it started mild and toasty and built to a spicy medium. So far I haven't had a smoke of this profile to match it at this price. I'm sold.
📜 Archival Review
January 29, 2006
"Great Smoke"
One of the best mild to medium smokes I've had in a while. This one has a geat flavor, good draw and you can't beat the price. After trying one I ordered a box.
📜 Archival Review
January 7, 2006
"A Vintage in every respect."
Number one I didn't expect this Connecticut wrapped beauty to be like the other Vintage smokes, but I did expect it to be as good for a milder connecticut wrapped smoke. And I was not dissapointed at all. It's much milder than the other Vintage series and it should be, but it has the same great roll and burn with a wonderful spicy flavor that is perfect for a A.M. smoke or my first smoke of the day. In fact I just ordered my second box sampler with 5 of 4 different sizes I liked the first so much. These are even better than the 5 Vegas Gold line IMO. Think I will be keeping these in stock in my humi from now on.
📜 Archival Review
July 25, 2005
"NOT a Vintage 1990"
I guess I should not be disappointed, but I am. I didn't expect it to live up to the Vintage 90, or did I? It DID burn evenly, and the ash was quite long and white, but other than a hint of sweet red wine, it was uneventful. Will ANYTHING match Patel's Vintage 1990?
Add Your Review
Share your experience with this cigar. All reviews are moderated before appearing on the site.