Cigar Specifications
Brand / Line:
Trinidad Y Cia
Cigar Name:
Pantela Superfino
Country of Origin:
Dominican Republic
Wrapper:
Ecuador
Filler:
D.R., Hon, Nic
Binder:
Honduras
Status:
Active
0 Recent Reviews
None yetNo recent reviews yet — be the first!
11 Archival Reviews
Show ↓📜 Archival Review
March 5, 2026
Best cheap cigar I have had!
📜 Archival Review
April 23, 2007
"The ultimate dog rocket!"
Well, I guess I can stop searching for the ultimate dog rocket, cuz I just found it. This had the draw of a solid block of cow dug only without the great taste. Yeah,it would have tasted better. I smoked,using the term loosely, a few minutes, recut it and tried again and thought, the taste sucks andt he draw is worst, thank God that this was in some cheap JR variety pack I bought. Okay I deserved it I guess but this one is a stay away from at all costs.
📜 Archival Review
April 10, 2007
"good bargan"
I have smoked several bundles of these. I find them "comfortable". The burn is not exactly even, but close. An occasional bit comes loose, but filtered cigarrettes would cure that (puke). They are consistently mild-medium. Not a Macanudo, but for the money their fine with me. One of the best low dollar smokes around.
📜 Archival Review
February 8, 2007
"eh..."
Construction and price is very good...burns ok too...only problem is it tastes like a monkey turd...plus youre constantly having to spit out little pieces of tabacco....good for tossing out to moochers...
📜 Archival Review
June 12, 2006
"value"
went through a bundle of these and they were all great. Not a super premium or anything, but for under a buck you can't beat it.
📜 Archival Review
April 5, 2006
"Great Bargain, Decent Smoke"
I smoke a lot of cigars and we all know that a 3 or 4 dolalr cigar for an everyday smoke can get really expensive, really fast. I tried this on a whim because of the price and must say, for 95 cents this is unbeatable; especially when compared to other cheap cigars i.e. Quorom. Good looking, well constructed cigar and, again, for the money it is a decent smoke.
📜 Archival Review
February 25, 2006
"Complete Garbage"
This had to be the worst I have had to date. Although it looks good, and the construction is solid, There is absolutely no taste, nada, none. Horrid
📜 Archival Review
July 7, 2005
"not bad..."
bought a bundle of these a few months ago on sale...7x48's..they were a little rough, so put them in the humidor to age a bit...two months later theyve improved, but definetely not my first choice...good burn, good construction/appearance/smell...taste..ok...theyre seconds so expect to spit out little bits of tobacco...ok for less than a buck a stick but theres better out there...
📜 Archival Review
March 23, 2005
"You get what you pay for"
I bought a bundle of these (cheap!) to put some hopefully everyday type smokes in the new humi. Smoked the first one tonight, and was not impressed. The construction was questionable, as it is made from the scraps of other cigars...After cutting it, the small filler kept coming out in my mouth. The burn was pretty even and slow, but the flavor was very mild and very straightforward without any real complexity. An earlier reviewer said that these improved drastically with age, so I will leave a few in the humi for awhile and see...the rest I will give to my "Black'n'Mild" smoking friends.
📜 Archival Review
November 8, 2003
"Surprisingly good"
A good cigar by any standard, incredible when you consider the price.
📜 Archival Review
January 25, 2003
"a great smoke in waiting"
bought a bundle wasn't impressed aged in humidor for 7 months, low and behold a butterfly emerged. nice flavor
Add Your Review
Share your experience with this cigar. All reviews are moderated before appearing on the site.