Cigar Specifications
Brand / Line:
Acid
Cigar Name:
Earthiness
Country of Origin:
Nicaragua
Size:
42 x 5
Wrapper:
Cameroon
Status:
Active
0 Recent Reviews
None yetNo recent reviews yet — be the first!
26 Archival Reviews
Show ↓📜 Archival Review
January 13, 2009
"Pers. Fav."
Honestly, this is my new favorite cigar. All my friends love them too. The size is perfect for this blend. Great IF you like infused cigars.
📜 Archival Review
October 3, 2008
"Good Stick"
Started off really sweet and intense then mellowed out to be a lightly sweet smooth smoke. To me it had a consistent herbal spice flavor with a mild sweetness. The sweetness was mostly on the tip that wore off half way through the stick. I got about 45 minutes of smoke out of it. Burn was great , construction was good and it had no soft spots. Towards the end the cap started to break apart but I was nearly finished anyways. If you like ACID and NATURAL cigars you will like this one.
📜 Archival Review
May 17, 2008
"Back to the Future!"
Acid the future of cigars? Whether it is or isn't, this little guy may be the best petit corona I've ever had. Taste a lot like it's big brother the "Cold Tea," which is outstanding. I last reviewed it about 18 months ago (see below) and what I said then, I stand by. The only problem with this cigar is that my wife keeps smoking they and I rarely get the chance to huff one down.
📜 Archival Review
October 29, 2007
"great stuff."
Have had many of these little dynamite sticks. Huge taste in a tiny package. Most definitely my favorite of the acid line. Price is definitely worth it.
📜 Archival Review
January 28, 2007
"Side Effects"
This cigar burned very nicely had a pleasant aroma and was accepted by my over all crowd but my only concern about this cigar was 20 minutes after wards i felt nauseous and tired. But then again thats what you get from a cigar that sounds hippy- ish
📜 Archival Review
November 6, 2006
"Misnomer, but not a mistake!"
Why this cigar is called Earthiness is beyond me. I've tasted earthiness in a cigar, I even like earthiness in a cigar on occasion, but brother this isn't earthiness. It is a refreshing, light, and tasty smoke just like the rest of the "holistic" line by acid. If you like Acid, you'll really like this little fella. Well I might not be a purist, but I'll take all I can get of these and the Cold Tea Infusion!
📜 Archival Review
June 16, 2006
"thick"
Great smoke with some bite. I agree with Mac on this being my second favorite. I still have a handfull to try in my sampler. The construction was good.
📜 Archival Review
January 16, 2006
"Acid does it again!"
This is the 7th of Acid's 21 cigar's I've partaken in and this is definitely my second favorite next to the Blondie. The flavor so far for the yellow line is wonderful. More floral and nutty than the sweet and asian spice of the blues. The Earthiness has spice too, but it's literally a hot spice. It burns the back of your throat in a good way like you've been partaking in some spicy food or wasabi! The cigar isn't as pretty as some of acid's other products and the draw is a little tight, but the smoke is rich and full and when it's rolling around in your mouth it's almost creamy and thick in consistency. An awesome smoke and since I only got one in Acid's gift tin I'm excited to go out and find some by themselves to purchase
📜 Archival Review
October 11, 2005
"MY FAVORITE SMOKE"
VERY NICE SMOKE. PROBABLY MY FAVORITE OF THE ACID LINE. A LITTLE PRICEY CONSIDERING THE SIZE. NO COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE SMELL.
📜 Archival Review
July 9, 2005
"strong little sucker...."
I was suprised by how strong this little stick was. while not as good as the kuba kuba ,its not a bad smoke,acid are a love'em or hate 'em type of smoke if you dig the other acid lines odds are you'll like this one as well,any way I like them as a change of pace theres only so many powerhouse/fullbodied cigars you can smoke with out a break,and my wife doesn't complain about the smoke either so thats always a big plus
📜 Archival Review
June 17, 2005
"not bad for a sweet dip"
This cigar manages to create artificially throughthe bklend of tobaco and dipping what good cigars do naturally with just tobaco. I will probably use thisone as a gift for friends who are new to cigars.
📜 Archival Review
May 27, 2005
"Taste Very Different"
Wow, must be going through a mid life crises. Next I'll be buying a Harley. Acid is far from a smokers usual, but the basics are there with good draw, burn and looks. taste is not bad, just different. I'll keep a few in my humidor.
📜 Archival Review
April 27, 2005
"so so"
Probally the best one in the acid line. I just started smoking cigars a few months ago and Acid is what got me started. So I really like these at first. Then I bought a whole box of em. Now that I have smoked some more traditional brands I smoke these just to kill time and get rid of them. A good smoke just not very consistent. Can burn uneven and like all the Acids once it burns about half way down the wrapped begins to crack. But good flavor and I got a box for 66.00$.
📜 Archival Review
March 14, 2005
"Earthiness?"
I guess they don't expect traditionalist to smoke these. This is far from earthy. Go figure, the "Dirt" cigar taste like Coke. Drew, hire a new marketing company name, these names are misrepresenting the smokes. Anyhow, this a sweet licorice smoke with hints of lipton tea. Zero complexity, non-existent tobacco flavors. Pricey!
📜 Archival Review
February 28, 2005
"steady"
im fairly new to the world of cigar smoking, but if im looking for a very reliable, cheap and enjoyable cigar i always pick up one of these.
📜 Archival Review
January 13, 2005
"Pretty good"
Not a traditional cigar, but the toasty and earthy tones throughout the smooth burn were really nice. The overtone of sweetness is something that you either love or hate, but I think they are a great change of pace from my standard Hoyos, Punches and Padrons.
📜 Archival Review
December 15, 2004
"miss"
acids are really hit and miss and this is a miss, the flavor is really bitter and leaves a bad after taste
📜 Archival Review
July 7, 2004
"It was Just ok. Nothing more."
I noticed right off the back some poor wrapping. But it was ok everywhere else. Was a little pricey too.
📜 Archival Review
July 7, 2004
"my new cigar"
the aroma is great it goes prefect with the taste and draw
📜 Archival Review
April 12, 2004
"A solid 8"
Pretty nice flavor. No problem with draw or construction. A little pricey for a petite.
📜 Archival Review
April 5, 2004
"save your money"
Tasted like I was smoking a dried flower dipped in sugar. About 2/3 of the way through the damn thing fell apart. The only positive thing I can say is the draw was fine.
If your into this kind of thing, a Swisher Sweet is probably better for many reasons.
If your into this kind of thing, a Swisher Sweet is probably better for many reasons.
📜 Archival Review
April 20, 2003
"Great Tasting Cigar"
This is a great tasting cigar available today. The flavor and smell, to include the aftertaste was great.
📜 Archival Review
January 16, 2003
"Disappointing smoke"
I had heard a lot about this one some good some bad, the draw was mediocre at best and the flavor disappointing
📜 Archival Review
September 15, 2002
"my cigar of choice"
This is the best cigar available today. Flavor, look, smell and even the aftertaste is wonderful. The only downfall is the occasionally poor constructed cigar which is hard to draw.
📜 Archival Review
January 11, 2000
this cigar is the under $5.00 exact substitute for a CUBAN monticristo#4
📜 Archival Review
December 4, 1999
this is the best cigar the smell is so nice.
Add Your Review
Share your experience with this cigar. All reviews are moderated before appearing on the site.