Cigar Specifications
Brand / Line:
Arturo Fuente Hemingway
Cigar Name:
Classic
Shape:
Churchill
Country of Origin:
Dominican Republic
Size:
48 x 7
Wrapper:
Cameroon
Filler:
Dominican Republic
Binder:
Dominican Republic
MSRP:
$6.95
Status:
Active
0 Recent Reviews
None yetNo recent reviews yet — be the first!
66 Archival Reviews
Show ↓📜 Archival Review
March 3, 2026
Good construction, typical Fuentes a good morning cigar. A little too mild for me. A good cigar nontheless.
📜 Archival Review
June 26, 2008
"Cameroon Heaven"
What can you say about a Fuente cigar. The father son duo has done it again. The Classic sized figurado is one of the smoothest cigars I've had and I always make sure I have plenty in the humidor (since I smoke at least 2 a week).
I have now hooked at least 3 colleagues on to them.
I have now hooked at least 3 colleagues on to them.
📜 Archival Review
March 25, 2008
"Nice smoke"
It was nice but I didnt think it was spectacular. Burned a little uneven but I really enjoyed the taste for the first and second third of the cigar. I think its a little overpriced but I would still recommend.
📜 Archival Review
January 22, 2008
"Classic"
Very enjoyable. Sweet smooth not too powerful but a joy from start to finish.
📜 Archival Review
January 18, 2008
"smooth"
A must try cigar. Medium bodied, smooth, and flavourful. What more can you ask for? A great cigar for all smokers. The Hemingway series is legendary and deserves high praise.
📜 Archival Review
September 13, 2007
"what a stogie!!!!"
This cigar was by far the best constructed I've seen to this point. It lit well and burned perfectly even with a full draw through the entire cigar. Just watching the evenness of the white ash was remarkable. The flavor was mild to medium bodied and was consistent throughout. What a great cigar! One of the best I've had.
📜 Archival Review
September 9, 2007
"All around good smoke"
Fuente cigars are among the most consistent cigars I've had. Smooth taste, even burn, and solid construction. The Classic is not the most flavorful, but still rates as a fine cigar.
📜 Archival Review
February 23, 2007
"primo cameroon"
jeez, hard to say if this is better than the don carlos, but i know its close! I think I like the Hemingway better (Classic vs. DC Belicoso) even though its a little more earthy than spicy (unusual for my taste). Such a well-made great blended gar!
📜 Archival Review
December 28, 2006
"nice cigar"
had a bunch of heminways, most pretty much are the same for me.
here there's even color, small veins, uniform. draw a little loose, perfect burn, light-grey ash.
tastes of barnyard and light woods, with hints of licorice and pecan. dry aftertaste of caramel in first half, greens in second half.
all in all a very good cigar
here there's even color, small veins, uniform. draw a little loose, perfect burn, light-grey ash.
tastes of barnyard and light woods, with hints of licorice and pecan. dry aftertaste of caramel in first half, greens in second half.
all in all a very good cigar
📜 Archival Review
October 12, 2006
"very nice"
I bought this because so far, smoke for smoke, fuente has not let me down yet. I've seen the reviews on the hemingway line and kept my eye out for them. On one of my long distance runs for work, I found a cigar shop I had never visited before. I walked in and saw these, short stories, and best seller's. This size was what I thought would give me a good indication of what they taste like. I think I paid 5.25 for it. I let it sit for two weeks although I think it was at the shop for some time. Now at this point, I believe I have tried a good range of cigars to tell good from bad. I lit this one up in the morning for about 40 minutes and put it out. After work, it was waiting for me. I relit it and was surprised, it still tasted as good as the first half. It was very mellow with a long finish. I didn't pick out a ton of individual flavors but usually I can only do that if I'm sitting in solitude and really analyzing the thing. I can say that for the price, it was very good. I will definitely put this in my rotation and turn others on to it. I'm new to the whole cameroon wrapper as I prefer maduros but whatever the sweet taste was due to, it was real nice. It got a little hot at the end however I may have been pullin' on it a little hard 'cause I wanted to finish it before I got home. It was almost as good as the aurora cien anos corona but half the price. Keep it up fuente! Oh yeah, there was a downside. The wrapper came unwraveled in one part but a wet tongue fixed that!
📜 Archival Review
August 1, 2006
"Wow."
Very nice cigar, my favorite right after a cuban Montecristo #2. Started out nice with the nice little taper on the end to light, after that it kept getting better.
📜 Archival Review
July 5, 2006
"OHHH MAN!! NICE SMOKE"
Yes i'm shouting!! But I loved this cigar. The classic Fuente construction and superb flavor. This cigar has a wonderful flavor to it. sweet, spicey with a bundh of other flavors in there. This is a complex smoke with perfect construction. Fuente diffently does not rush the hands of time. This is a mellow and perfectly aged smoke that is one of the most relaxing out there. Excellent.
📜 Archival Review
June 27, 2006
"top notch"
spicy and sweet, consistent from box to box; one of my all time faves
📜 Archival Review
May 30, 2006
"A classic"
This is one of my favorite Fuentes. Smooth tasting and great drawing cigars. Good construction. I smoke one of these every other week, and they have been very consistant. Good investment to put in the humidor.
📜 Archival Review
April 17, 2006
"Simply awesome"
Definitley one of my favorite cigars. This is the type of cigar that you know will never let you down. Burns nice, draws nice, smells great with its cameroom wrapper, and tastes good.
📜 Archival Review
March 19, 2006
"If only there were cheaper"
Wonderful flavor from the Cameroon wrapper on these bad boys. I love the shape and the experience of these--something about them awakens inspiration and empowers you. Had some burn issues but corrected them easily as I drank a cup of Montecristo coffee with it. A wonderful experience--if you havent tried it yet, make it a priority. Not everyones cup of tea but theres no denying the quality in construction and flavor.
📜 Archival Review
March 12, 2006
"Down right tastey smoke"
This was one of the best tasting smokes that I have ever had. The flavor of anise floated in and out, while a spicey finish remain through the entire hour plus smoke. The draw was easy and the burn was sharp. As soon as I find some more of these sticks, I will be adding them to my humidor.
📜 Archival Review
January 14, 2006
"Good taste but ...."
The construction on the two that I had let me down .... wrapper cracking and flaking during smoking making the experience a PITA. I have had wrapper issues with other Fuente Cameroons so I stored these in my 70% box. Same problem ... too bad because I like the taste of these. Bad luck?
📜 Archival Review
December 28, 2005
"Does Fuente make a bad one?"
Another perfect draw and burn, cappucino flavored delight. I actually like the smaller Hemingway's flavors better (a bit more intense), but this was still a winner.
📜 Archival Review
December 18, 2005
"near perfect"
Medium bodied, smooth and consistant.
I can only say good things about this cigar. Overworked superlatives such as: "great" or "excellent" just do not do justice in describing the construction, burn and flavor of this smoke.
This has been my New Years Eve cigar for several yeas.
I can only say good things about this cigar. Overworked superlatives such as: "great" or "excellent" just do not do justice in describing the construction, burn and flavor of this smoke.
This has been my New Years Eve cigar for several yeas.
📜 Archival Review
November 6, 2005
"Excellent in every way"
A long and well-made perfecto with a shiny wrapper; all the Hemingway perfectos are nice to look at, and this one is no exception. It's easy to light as expected. As is with almost all perfectos the burn starts a bit uneven, but it quickly straightens out and never needs a correction. The draw is easy and full with a generous amount of smoke. Ash is well-formed and hangs for a while. This smoke has a unique taste consisting of woody and honey graham cracker flavors. Later becomes nuttier and creamier, and the draw becomes even better producing even more smoke. An excellent all-around cigar; if you can find in the $7-$8 range, it's also an excellent value.
📜 Archival Review
October 22, 2005
"good"
nice smooth hardy flavor and draw
📜 Archival Review
September 6, 2005
"Go To Smoke"
This was my second cigar ever and I loved it, in fact this is the one that I save for special occasions.
📜 Archival Review
May 23, 2005
"So good...they go unappreciated"
This line gets a lot of hype...so it is difficult to live up to the buzz. I have bought multiple boxes of this smoke and every one has been consistently brilliant. The mellow, slightly sweet flavor never disappoints...in fact, it is so good that it may be a victim of it's own greatness. Life is about opportunities...just sit back and enjoy 1 1/2 hours of pure bliss with your favorite beverage. Bravo, Fuente...
📜 Archival Review
February 9, 2005
"A bit pricey but..."
I love these! They burn great and are very well made. I love how they light. I love the flavor. If they were a little less expensive, I'd smoke one every single day.
📜 Archival Review
December 30, 2004
"horribly disappointed"
bad smoke... bad burn, uneven, flaky, bitter taste. Smoked 2/3 of the stick and tossed the rest in the fireplace. (didn't burn any better). Worse smoke this year.
📜 Archival Review
August 16, 2004
"Truly a classic"
As I left work this afternoon for the ride home in the emergency backup
convertible, it was a beautiful sunny day in the 70s here in NorCal. I
dropped the top, fired up the CD player, (Toad the Wet Sprocket), and
fished around for the cigar case in my briefcase.
Voila! There it was. A Hemingway Classic I picked up at South Coast
Plaza in '95 while doing some Christmas shopping in the Southland.
Mwahaha! This cigar was to be sacrificed to the flame, at last!
What a specimen. The cello was more yellow than Edward G. Robinson's
teeth, and the Cameroon wrapper fairly glowed with its oily promise of
tastacular delight. As I slid the cello off the stick, the ring slid
along with it, loose as a vegetarian's stool the day after bingeing at
an all-you-can-eat salad bar.
I clipped it, and the remaining cap stayed intact, much like my first,
rather frustrating, high school sweetheart. Pre-light draw was tight
(see above) and flavorful (also see above), with a dusky spiciness that
testified to the care with which the cigar was lovingly aged.
First puff was sublime. Building from the aforementioned tightness, as
the foot caught the draw loosened appreciably and allowed the delightful
medium to light smoke to flow freely. Marvelous, complex flavors burst
forth and cavorted on my taste buds. The ash was light and solid, and
grew to an amazing length, especially given the turbulence inside the
cockpit of my chariot.
The flavor rapidly built as I smoked this beauty down to the nub.
Little traffic, perhaps due to the spring school holiday, meant that the
miles rolled by quickly. The beautiful weather and lush green
California hills were a perfect counterpoint to this sublime sacrifice
to the tobacco gods. By the time I rolled around the corner to home,
the cigar had gone through several metamorphoses and finally ended up a
powerful and full flavored spicemeister that made my tongue tingle like
that special feeling you got while climbing the rope in gym class.
Thanks Carlos and family for the treat. And thanks to mother nature for
the graphic display of planetary perfection that today exemplified.
convertible, it was a beautiful sunny day in the 70s here in NorCal. I
dropped the top, fired up the CD player, (Toad the Wet Sprocket), and
fished around for the cigar case in my briefcase.
Voila! There it was. A Hemingway Classic I picked up at South Coast
Plaza in '95 while doing some Christmas shopping in the Southland.
Mwahaha! This cigar was to be sacrificed to the flame, at last!
What a specimen. The cello was more yellow than Edward G. Robinson's
teeth, and the Cameroon wrapper fairly glowed with its oily promise of
tastacular delight. As I slid the cello off the stick, the ring slid
along with it, loose as a vegetarian's stool the day after bingeing at
an all-you-can-eat salad bar.
I clipped it, and the remaining cap stayed intact, much like my first,
rather frustrating, high school sweetheart. Pre-light draw was tight
(see above) and flavorful (also see above), with a dusky spiciness that
testified to the care with which the cigar was lovingly aged.
First puff was sublime. Building from the aforementioned tightness, as
the foot caught the draw loosened appreciably and allowed the delightful
medium to light smoke to flow freely. Marvelous, complex flavors burst
forth and cavorted on my taste buds. The ash was light and solid, and
grew to an amazing length, especially given the turbulence inside the
cockpit of my chariot.
The flavor rapidly built as I smoked this beauty down to the nub.
Little traffic, perhaps due to the spring school holiday, meant that the
miles rolled by quickly. The beautiful weather and lush green
California hills were a perfect counterpoint to this sublime sacrifice
to the tobacco gods. By the time I rolled around the corner to home,
the cigar had gone through several metamorphoses and finally ended up a
powerful and full flavored spicemeister that made my tongue tingle like
that special feeling you got while climbing the rope in gym class.
Thanks Carlos and family for the treat. And thanks to mother nature for
the graphic display of planetary perfection that today exemplified.
📜 Archival Review
July 30, 2004
"Outstanding"
Perfect in every respect except one: the flavor profile is not very interesting. But for a medium body/strength cigar with a slightly sweet taste that will burn for an hour or more, these can't be beat. It may be cliche, but they really do burn better after 6 months to a year in the humidor.
📜 Archival Review
July 21, 2004
"let em age and then look out--whoopass"
The last time I reviewed this cigar I said it was not good and aging would probably not improve it. Well I could not have been more wrong. I smoked a stick that had been aging for almost a year and a half and oh boy what a smoke. Sweet, smooth, full bodied, rich, nutty, balanced . . . I just can't say enough. I really can't believe aging can make such a difference but in this cigar it does. Needless to say I went out and bought a whole box and put them aside for next year.
📜 Archival Review
April 25, 2004
"solid"
Like all Fuentes, this is a solid cigar. Quite mellow and not very complex. Draw and burn were great.
📜 Archival Review
October 22, 2003
"lives up to the hype"
I thought this had a great taste start to finish. A nutty yet mellow flavor that is incredibly smooth. The only Thing I couldn't explain is I swear I had smoked one of these before...No it just reminds me of a more refined Excalibur No I! Not identical but similar flavors.
📜 Archival Review
July 21, 2003
"Great ISOM Alternative"
I love these things. One of the best features is the figurado tip which is so easy to light. Other than that, to me, it's basically a Churchill.
Sweet, consistent flavor--not as sweet as a Short Story. Rich but smooth, with a little spice. Stays mild way down the stick. Great draw. Very consistent. I've never had a bad one.
One minor complaint: the Cubans beat this stick in complexity. The Classic's taste is not complex, and it doesn't change much as it burns.
Better than a Don Carlos, if you ask me.
Sweet, consistent flavor--not as sweet as a Short Story. Rich but smooth, with a little spice. Stays mild way down the stick. Great draw. Very consistent. I've never had a bad one.
One minor complaint: the Cubans beat this stick in complexity. The Classic's taste is not complex, and it doesn't change much as it burns.
Better than a Don Carlos, if you ask me.
📜 Archival Review
July 2, 2003
"Great Smoke!!"
I just tried the Maduros and then these. I am quite impressed. They burn slowly, evenly, and taste fantastic. It's too bad you can't find them in the store......
📜 Archival Review
March 30, 2003
"For Pure Enjoyment"
It has been several years since I smoked a Hemingway cigar. Some of the people I smoke cigars with were less than thrilled with their last try at this pricey smoke. So I bought a 5 pack a few months ago and tonight I tried one. A beautiful looking smoke that feels great in the hand. A mellow start, which becomes medium flavored with a nutty taste that I found to be great. A toasty cigar which delivers a steady solid enjoyable smoking experience. The draw was a little tight to start and I kept waiting for it to open up to a full flavored knock-out smoke, but this isn't a powerhouse, just an excellent medium range cigar that has a good medly of flavor packed in a beautiful package. The buzz factor is low, yet the enjoyment factor is much higher than a lot of the cigars on the market today.
📜 Archival Review
March 29, 2003
"pleasure to smoke"
very consistent quality.
📜 Archival Review
March 27, 2003
"ok"
was a little dissappointing. ok spice but got a littlle harsh during last third. constuction was not as good as most Fuentes.
📜 Archival Review
March 11, 2003
"Burnt down to the nub"
This one was a bit pricey, but several of the other Hemingways have been so good, and this one name told me to buy it. I got 2 at $9/ea. The overall construction was excellent, the burn and ash .. superb. As for the flavor, a bit mild for my liking, but as it burned down, I definitely enjoye it much more. Had a nice woodsy flavor with a hint of spice. Give this one a chance, it was a slow starter, but once it got going, you can put it down... 🙂
📜 Archival Review
February 17, 2003
"A must try"
I like to keep a few of these around as it its a great smoke that gets better with time in the humidor. I love the hemi flavour ant the extra time given by the classic versus the shot story. Take care of them because the wrapper does not take rough handling well.
📜 Archival Review
January 28, 2003
"second time around"
This was the second time I tried this cigar. The first time I could not decide if I liked it or not and thought it needed to age a little. So I went to the store and bought three, one to smoke and two to age. Well I wish I hadn't. shape and construction was good, as was the draw but flavor was flat, leathery and woody. No complexity or balance. I doubt that aging will improve this cigar.
📜 Archival Review
January 19, 2003
"Good Smoke"
I just go through smoking one of these. This is another cigar from my spending spree at the local cigar shop. Let me start by saying this is the first of the Hemingway line I have tried. What a great looking cigar, a dark rich wrapper, and the Figuardo shape. I have heard so much about these; I couldn’t wait to smoke it. I didn’t particularly care for the construction of the cap, the rest of the cigar looked and felt great. The draw was good, unlit and lit. The only problem I had with this cigar is that it canoed on me immediately. It worked itself after the first 2 inches, after that it burned flat even the rest of the cigar. The ash was a great dark gray in color and kept holding for about an inch and a half each time. The taste had definitely a woody flavor and was very smooth medium bodied for the first three quarters. The finish was completely different, it became spicy and more full bodied, a great finish. One thing I really like a about this is cigar was the aroma. I ran outside to grab some thing from my vehicle and when I came back inside I couldn’t believe the great aroma coming from all the smoke. I paid $10.00 for the Classic, a little pricey but I think it was worth it. BOTTOM LINE: Very good smoke, meticulous construction, great taste, a little too expensive to be an everyday smoke. Maybe I will come into some money and be able to smoke these all the time.
📜 Archival Review
January 8, 2003
"10 to 7"
Expected a 10 got a 7. Hype had my expectations high. Too harsh and not enough distinguishable flavor. Beautiful perfecto though.
📜 Archival Review
November 10, 2002
"Great smoke"
I loved the taste of this one, but the construction could have been a little better. It just wouldn't stay lit.
📜 Archival Review
September 27, 2002
"fantastic smoke here"
The best non cuban cigar I have smoked to date. Solidly smooth creamy vanilla cofee flavor throughout with hints of berry. slight construction prob as wrapper cracked. smoked fine even with the crack.
📜 Archival Review
May 8, 2002
"Hemingway Masterpiece?"
Wonderful construction, truly a work of art (no pun intended.) Nice dark toothy wrapper with lots of oils. Did not enjoy the flavor have had some older sticks that are wonderful this one was overly spicy and not smooth at all. Basically pepper is all I tasted nothing else very 1 dimensional.
📜 Archival Review
July 5, 2001
Not sure what shape this cigar would be descibed as. Everyone describes it as a figurado but that doesn't narrow it down much. All I can say is that it is 7" long and has a 48 ring gauge. It is of exceptional quality and is definitely one of my favorit
📜 Archival Review
May 30, 2001
This is the best cigar that I have ever smoked.
📜 Archival Review
May 16, 2000
I smoked it last night and could not sleep afterward, my mind was a slave to the tastebuds,which now are telling me to get off this computer and get them back to Mr.Hemmingway.
📜 Archival Review
February 1, 2000
Very smooth, rich body
📜 Archival Review
December 9, 1999
I have a box in my humidor for 5 months. A great smoke. Beautiful wrapper and shape. Lights easily and burns even. A well made cigar. Packed with tobacco. Perfect draw. white ash. Medium bodied, but the taste is so full and rich. buzz factor=5
📜 Archival Review
September 7, 1999
nice smooth smoke but not enough,or the right flavor for me. the after taste was very good but i didnt burn my fingers getting to it
📜 Archival Review
August 2, 1999
I found the Hemingway lived up to an article in the Tampa Tribune as being the best cigar for under $10.00.
📜 Archival Review
July 19, 1999
Best tasting cigar I smoke
📜 Archival Review
July 12, 1999
hard to get
📜 Archival Review
June 2, 1999
Best damn cigar available at any price.... consistent top quality
📜 Archival Review
March 23, 1999
Well made, fine looking cigar. Flavor was harsh, not at all pleasantly full bodied.
📜 Archival Review
March 3, 1999
A light bodied smoke of very little complexity. Good draw and burn with that wonderful "Fuente Aroma". Mild cedary finish. Not nearly in the same league as the "Signature".
📜 Archival Review
February 6, 1999
Smooth draw, great flavor and excellent consistentcy make this the best damn cigar I've ever smoked.
📜 Archival Review
September 28, 1998
loveeeed.
📜 Archival Review
September 25, 1998
Wonderful appearance and great taste, a personal favorite.
📜 Archival Review
August 10, 1998
This was the hour I didn't want to end. What a wonderful
cigar. I'd smoke them every day if I could afford it.
cigar. I'd smoke them every day if I could afford it.
📜 Archival Review
June 24, 1998
love the wrapper..
📜 Archival Review
April 28, 1998
ONE OF THE BEST CIGAR IN THE WHOLE WORLD. VERY CONSISTENT, BUT ARE VERY HARD TO FIND.
📜 Archival Review
April 20, 1998
One of the best cigars purduced in the free world.
📜 Archival Review
February 21, 1998
No question, for the money, the best smoke on earth.
📜 Archival Review
January 15, 1998
A superior smoke.
📜 Archival Review
September 11, 1997
A great cigar at a great price
Add Your Review
Share your experience with this cigar. All reviews are moderated before appearing on the site.