Camacho 1962 Churchill

Great cigar! A bit sweet and peppery and a bunch of other flavors I can't quite describe, this cigar has a lot of flavor and is medium to full bodied.

AGED TOO MUCH AS IT SEEMS. FAST BURNER, ALTHOUGH EVEN, IT WAS A LITTLE ON THE DRY SIDE WITH LITTLE GUTS TO IT. I LOVE CAMACHO'S LINES. FULL BODY ABOUNDS IN MOST. NOT THIS PUPPY. I TRIED A PRE-EMBARGO FROM THIS LINE AND HAVE TO SAY THEY WERE VERY SIMILAR. SO CLOSE YOUR EYES CALL IT ONE AND THEN YOU CAN SAY IT WAS A BARGIN. SORRY I ONLY CALL EM AS I SEE EM.

Smoked two of these so far. The first one was great. Perfect burn, tons of thick creamy smoke. A little lighter than a typical Camacho, but I really enjoyed it.

The second one was a little off. Didn't burn well, and it got a little hot. But...the same smooth, creamy flavor was there most of the time.

I'll buy more.

Better than the first. I didn't rate the first one because I knew they would get better. Good burn, medium body with spice sweet, toasty flavors. Still my least favorite of the 62s but gaining ground.

I'm a big fan of Camacho cigars and this is one i had been meaning to try for awhile so a friend gifted me a couple. The initial rush of flavor was definitely camacho-like. Although more of a medium bodied smoke it had lots of flavor and clean finish. A good afternoon smoke. Eiroa's Jamastran strain of tobacco is very distinctive and I can pick it up in every product they use it in. Slightly sweet and peppery with cedar/wood notes underlying it all. Theres a little in the '62 which keeps it interesting. While this isn't my favorite Camacho (as Scotty below me has implied, it IS a bit overpriced) it is one i will definitely buy if I can get a good deal on them.

A straightforward, full bore with both barrels tobacco blast. Cigar looked ok, smoked, and burnt fine. One dimensional but fairly smooth. I paid about $6.50. Had about 3 months of boxtime on it. It's not that there was anything bad about this stick...BUT for 6.50 there had better be something damn good!

Ive had a few of the 62s and bought a box of the 62 pre embargos (which are wayyyy better) and both 1962 lines have one thing in common- they are rolled way to loose. I have more Ash burns from this cigar then all others combined.

Because of the loose roll, its burns uneven and at times very hot which translates to tarry. Perhaps a churhill size is not the best choice because of the roll. Anyway despite the loose roll ive found in pretty much al sizes and singles, its a good core smoke. Classic Cmacho. No "Hints" of cherry or vanilla. its just raw tobacco and while different, its respectable. Skip a box of these and go to Cigar.com were you can buy a couple singles of the 1962 Pre Embargo!

Not the typical camacho. A little disappointed, needs some more time in the humi. Seemed to be a little green??