Cigar Specifications
Brand / Line:
Camacho Corojo
Cigar Name:
Churchill
Shape:
Churchill
Country of Origin:
Honduras
Size:
48 x 7
Wrapper:
Honduras
Filler:
Honduras
Binder:
Honduras
MSRP:
$5.60
Status:
Active
0 Recent Reviews
None yetNo recent reviews yet — be the first!
25 Archival Reviews
Show ↓📜 Archival Review
November 8, 2008
"My Favorite Smoke"
If you are looking for a full flavor cigar that packs a punch, then you just found it.
They look great, they taste superb, they have a nice loose draw and they are affordable.
I would also mention that I haven't come across one cigar with a bad draw yet. I can't say that about any other brand I have smoked.
Really, almost too good to be true.
They look great, they taste superb, they have a nice loose draw and they are affordable.
I would also mention that I haven't come across one cigar with a bad draw yet. I can't say that about any other brand I have smoked.
Really, almost too good to be true.
📜 Archival Review
July 2, 2008
"GO GO Camacho"
This is a very good smoke for me I like flavor and I like power in my smokes. And this delivers both and in buckets. Sweet cedary and spicy almost peppery. This is a power house of a smoke. Construction way very good no burn issues of draw problems. This is the way a corojo should tast like.
📜 Archival Review
June 23, 2008
"good smoke"
This corojo is no doubt one of the finest out. Woody nutty spicy all that good stuff. construction is impecable .THe only downside this time around Tatuaje has become my cigar of choice and the similarities in these cigars( camacho corojo+Tatuaje brown label) forces me to compare the two , and unfortunately this cigar is missing that super long spicy/burnt carmel finish I love so much in the Brown label. but over all highyly recommended (just dont spoil yourself on the best cigars in the world).
📜 Archival Review
November 20, 2007
"That's More Like It!"
After smoking the Camacho Legend Series which was mediocre, I had to make sure that it wasn't me. It wasn't. A Camacho is still a very good cigar. The churchill was strong, but flavorful. Strong is easy, strong and flavorful isn't easy. This cigar was attractive in a rustic kinda way and the burn and aroma were more than adequate. Thank you for reaffirming my faith in Camacho!
📜 Archival Review
July 7, 2007
"If you like flavor, you gotta try these"
I've smoked a few of these over the past month and it is quickly becoming one of my favorite cigars. These sticks consistently amaze me with their full-flavored, toasty qualities. They have just the right kick without becoming harsh or overpowering. Perfect draw with large volumes of smoke. I personally haven't had any burn issues worth noting. I'm rapidly becoming a major Camacho fan with these at the top of the list. I'll definitely be buying a box or two very soon.
📜 Archival Review
June 19, 2007
"Coming around."
Overall I've foud these less than stellar especially where consistency of construction and flavor is concerned. I've gotten very good flavor and very poor construction and then the reverse. Finally the box time is bringing the flavor, construction and burn together. That's a good thing since I'm currently aging the better part of 4 boxes.
📜 Archival Review
September 29, 2006
"Overall a good smoke..."
Not what I had hoped for in a Camacho. Flavor in the cigars I've smoked since the last review have not had the flavor of the first. They're not bad by any means but the brand is supposed to ensure quality. Hype more than substance, i don't know but they should be better.
📜 Archival Review
February 12, 2006
"Can I have another please?"
This is a very good cigar. Just enough flavor to be interesting without overpowering the pallate. Has hints of nuts and a toasty character with strong hints of spice on the finish. Yet smooth throughout. Only negative was 3/4 through it had burn problems. I've had this problem with several Camacho's. And the cap is delicate--very hard to cut w/o it tearing off. Otherwise a great smoke, one I think I'll keep handy for the summer on the porch with a good iced tea.
📜 Archival Review
November 22, 2005
"darn tasty"
this is what i would call a full flavored stick. i really liked the corojo flavor. the construction was beautiful, the burn and draw was very good as well as a very good volume of smoke. a very enjoyable stick.
📜 Archival Review
September 10, 2005
"Excellent Full Body Smoke"
Bought a stick at a local shop. Great smoke, full flavored but smooth as can be. This one will give you that Cuban buzz. Will buy a box for sure.
📜 Archival Review
August 26, 2005
"What's the secret??"
How the hell do you cut this great tasting earthy Honduran flavor bomb without destroying the cap?? I've smoked three out of a box and two have split when cut. If you know the secret please let me know.
📜 Archival Review
April 20, 2005
"Great Cigar"
One of my new favorites, you cannot go wrong with this cigar. It really has a lot of flavor.
📜 Archival Review
February 24, 2005
"come here camacho"
one of the best cigars I've had. I recieved this box as a gift and couldn't be happier. Great flavor and construction. The cigar burns evenly and has a good draw. I thought it would have a tight draw due to the sold feel but I was pleasently surprised.
📜 Archival Review
May 11, 2004
"Frisky!"
I was reaching for a Partagas Serie S & I noticed the foot on this Camacho was getting a bit tattered, so I figured I better smoke it. It is one of the last of a box I bought over a year ago (at least I hope I have some more). The pre-light had a distinct cedary flavor. This medium to full bodied stick has a sweet pepper-spice quality that just kicks ass. Some of that barnyard I love too. I'm a nose smoker. I am always waving the cigar under my nose to suck up the most flavor & aroma that a stick will possibly give up. This stick has an excellent frisky quality to the nose. Just awesome! It reminds me of the 1st Camacho Corojo I smoked, which was one of the better sticks of my life. I have since chased the Camacho dragon & have been disappointed. Til now. From now on, I buy a box & store them for about 18 months. Geez! Can I wait that long?
📜 Archival Review
March 18, 2004
"Very good cigar"
I'de take this cigar over just about any cigar in the World, Bar-non. Hard to get at the correst humidity, but when there on, Ohhh baby. Also can be over lit and get ash flavor, do to the slightly loose roll. Pre-lite taste like pumpkin pie, I'm glad I like Pumpkin pie. 65% -+ 1-2% is about right
📜 Archival Review
November 1, 2003
"very good"
This was a very good smoke. I had had the corona and was disappointed by it, so my expectations were low for this one. Lots of powerful, tasty smoke. Burned a bit fast and uneven, but not too bad.
📜 Archival Review
September 16, 2003
"Overdelivered"
Didn't expect a lot, simply because of the hype. Been let down too many times. This is a great, straightforward cigar, excellent taste all it's own. Well made, well done. Hats off to the maker, they overdelivered for a change.
📜 Archival Review
September 3, 2003
"THE Corojo!"
Nice overall appearance and construction; the wrapper has a perfect deep redish corojo color with excellent prelit aroma . Burn was somewhat uneven at times, but the draw remained consistent and more than generous throughout. The flavor is where this cigar excels: pepper, leather, smoked wood and a hint of herbal sweetness combine for a complex full-bodied smoke with an amazingly long and smooth finish. This is one of the best tasting cigars I have ever had. Even more "Cuban" than its Camacho Havana sibling, and beats the former in complexity and depth of flavor. A truly great cigar.
📜 Archival Review
January 23, 2003
"$MONEY$"
Man was this a great cigar. I haven't smoked a non-cuban in quite some time, but this is one of the best I've had. Reminds me of the Cuban Cohiba Robusto... a lot. Got one box, getting more! !
📜 Archival Review
January 16, 2003
"great churchill"
A great churchill to smoke, it is quickly becoming one of my to 5. The tastes of nut and cedar was prevalent, aqnd the aroma was toasty. Greatly enjoyed it.
📜 Archival Review
January 8, 2003
"Fuerte"
That's what I'm talking about! I paid 67 bucks for a box of these and IMHO they rival Padron 64 or Opus. Not as fancy roll, but super woody flavors with a nice dose of cayenne precede the Cubanesque buzz. Burn and draw were flawless in the first few so far. I think me and Julio Eiroa are going to be friends for a long time to come.
📜 Archival Review
December 28, 2002
"Not the Punch"
Typical nutty flavor for a corojo wrapper, but this one falls off quickly and doesn't get anything back before the finish. Overall this stick can't carry the jock of for the Punch Rare Corojo. Too bad.
📜 Archival Review
December 9, 2002
"Powerful and tasty"
Camacho has come up with a powerful and smooth smoke with this cigar. Nicely rounded and full flavored smoke that has a pleasant kick. Burn was even, ash held together nicely and there was plenty of smoke with this stick. Draw was slightly firm but was consistent.
📜 Archival Review
August 6, 2002
"POWER!!!!"
From the first smell, I knew these would be powerful. I was right. THICK smoke. Buzzed me after only 1/4 way down. Taste and aroma reminded me of Cuban Cohiba. Definately getting another box.
📜 Archival Review
July 14, 2002
"Quite Good"
This cigar is almost world class, but not quite. The appearance and construction are excellent, the flavor isn't quite up to snuff but is still very good. I suspect that with some age in the humidor, this would be a brilliant smoke. Given the price of this cigar, it's a marvel -- excellent value.
Add Your Review
Share your experience with this cigar. All reviews are moderated before appearing on the site.