Cigar Specifications
Brand / Line:
Car. Torano Tribute
Cigar Name:
2003 Robusto
Shape:
Robusto
Country of Origin:
Nicaragua
Size:
50 x 5
Wrapper:
Ecuador
Status:
Discontinued
0 Recent Reviews
None yetNo recent reviews yet — be the first!
13 Archival Reviews
Show ↓📜 Archival Review
September 12, 2007
"Crap sack"
I just bought two of these, and they both had an odd smell. I just thought that it must be the age of them, they even looked great. However, they both tasted like mold and aged crap. I loved it. Not
📜 Archival Review
September 2, 2006
"all flavor"
This was a good looking smoke with a cestnut wrapper and some oil. The cap cut with no end trails and the pr-lit draw was smooth with some taste of wood. The foot lit even and burned with a some what of a crumbly ash. The taste was medium and had notes of wood and a light spice of earth with a lovely flavor on the finish of wheat. Just what I needed on a day like today.
📜 Archival Review
June 23, 2006
"Nice Carlos!"
After the dog of a cuban I just smoked, this was a breath of fresh air! Smooth as silk and an amazing, no, perfect burn. I still balk at an 8 dollar price tag, but if you have to spend it...here it is.
📜 Archival Review
May 7, 2006
"Very, very good"
This was a great cigar; quite Cubanesque in flavor, but with much better construction than your average Habano! The cigar felt solid, drew perfectly off a shallow cut and burnt without a single correction. The flavors started out crisp, with oak and a very mild, pleasant grassiness. (For the record, I really dislike grassy cigars, so don't misinterpret my description. This did not taste like lawn clippings). Towards the middle, it had a very nice chocolate milk flavor to it. Towards the end, it returned to wood and had some hints of nutmeg. All in all, a tremendous smoke; quite possibly the best medium-bodied non-Cuban I’ve had.
📜 Archival Review
February 8, 2006
"Nice, but don't pay too much"
I smoked 2 of these before deciding how I felt about them. They look and draw very very well. They tasted, not everage, but uneventful. Otherwise, they were smooth and easy to smoke down to blistered fingers. I have seen these for up to 10 bucks a stick, but please dont even think about paying that much. You can get a box of 22 now and then for about 5 bucks a stick if you look around. That being said, I would not break my back looking for a deal on these either. Very good, but not worth investing in.
📜 Archival Review
May 24, 2005
"hmmm hmmm good"
I've had four of these now and have a few more sitting in the humidor. A great after dinner smoke. Especially after having had a steak. When humidified correctly, they have a robust, almost chocolaty flavor. I will admit--having had one dried out a bit--they can get flat easy. But the store I've bought them from recently has good aged ones with the little white specks all over them and taste great overall. Just harder to find where I'm at. Good smoke but slightly pricey. Wish I could buy a box.
📜 Archival Review
July 11, 2004
"Darn good"
A mile to medium cigar that held it's flavor throughout the smoke. Impeccable construction.
📜 Archival Review
March 13, 2004
"From worst to first"
The first one I got was the worst cigar I've had this year, then I got another one from a newly opened box from a different store, and it was the best cigar I've had this year.
Full of flavor, not overly strong and beautifully made.
The difference was due to the storage conditions, so if you get a dry tasteless one, try again at a better store...it's worth it.
Full of flavor, not overly strong and beautifully made.
The difference was due to the storage conditions, so if you get a dry tasteless one, try again at a better store...it's worth it.
📜 Archival Review
March 9, 2004
"Good Cigar, average value"
The wrapper is fantastic on this cigar. However, I was a little disappointed with the burn, as I did not experience the razor sharp edge effect. Flavor is not as full as you'd expect but quite pleasant.
📜 Archival Review
January 28, 2004
"$7????????"
Seemed refined, but lacks flavor. Smoked to nub. never got bad, and never got good.
📜 Archival Review
January 22, 2004
"a beautiful cigar"
Beautiful to look at, perfect construction and lush draw. Sharp burn all the way with lots of thick aromatic smoke.
📜 Archival Review
January 20, 2004
"Impeccable"
Quite possibly the finest wrapper I have ever seen. Construction was as good as it gets. The burn never varied from razor sharp. Medium bodied with a nice full finish. Even at $10 paid, you can not go wrong with this beautiful cigar. Going to buy more. Highly recommended.
📜 Archival Review
January 8, 2004
"another great torano"
beautiful oily wrapper, great construction, medium bodied, plenty of full flavor. price was steep, but its a LE
Add Your Review
Share your experience with this cigar. All reviews are moderated before appearing on the site.