Cigar Specifications
Brand / Line:
Excalibur by HDM
Cigar Name:
No. I (M)
Shape:
Double Corona
Country of Origin:
Honduras
Size:
54 x 7.5
Filler:
USA/Conn Broadleaf
Binder:
D.R., Hon, Nic
MSRP:
$5.75
Status:
Active
0 Recent Reviews
None yetNo recent reviews yet — be the first!
69 Archival Reviews
Show ↓📜 Archival Review
March 5, 2026
"A log of goodness"
A consistent cigar with medium power and complex flavors of cedar, coffe, and chocolates...One of my favorites
📜 Archival Review
March 5, 2026
"Best Value in Cigars!!"
Awesome Value. GREAT chocolate, creamy tastes. Only cigar I've ever burned my fingers with. I never want them to end.
📜 Archival Review
June 11, 2008
"a classic"
A solid smoke in every sense. This stick does not excel in any one category, it does well in all of them. I take this stick out every time I want to insure I have a good smoke. It never falls short.
📜 Archival Review
May 28, 2008
"Excellent"
This was an excellent cigar. I bought a box for my daughters birth. Truly excellent.... excellent wrapper and appearance. Great flavor with an even burn. I will make sure that my humidor is never out of them again.
📜 Archival Review
October 30, 2007
"well crafted but dull"
Good looking wrapper. First third tastes like, well, CTBL. In a good way, since I've always loved the broadleaf. But there wasn't much going on beneath the sweet and peppery zing of the wrapper. Given the size of this behemoth, I kept waiting for the flavors to evolve, but to no avail. There was a little woody base, but it was relatively static for 90 minutes. For someone seeking their CTBL fix, there are cheaper, less cumbersome ways to get it.
📜 Archival Review
October 15, 2007
"a classic right out of the gate"
I agree with all that this is a great cigar, but wait....if you put this baby in your humidor and let it sit for a year(which is hard to do)it becomes a cigar for the ages!!! I can't believe the price of the babies and the taste is unbelievable as well!!!!!!!!! WOW!!!!
📜 Archival Review
October 7, 2007
"all-star cigar"
I think this is by far one of the best cigars out there for your money.Excellent taste throughout and a cigar that I keep on hand at all times in my humidor.No other cigar has a permanent place in my humidor except this one!!!!! That says it all.
📜 Archival Review
October 5, 2007
"smooth"
This was smooth & creamy, with large volumes of smoke. Medium-bodied to start, but got quite a bit stronger into the last 3rd. Like previous reviewers, I bought this b/c it was on the top 25 under $6 - and glad I did. No need to let this one rest, it is delish right away. The perfect draw and construction made this more enjoyable than the Padron 4000M I had last week.
📜 Archival Review
September 15, 2007
"Another good value"
The price is right. Good looking, well constructed, with ample smoke and taste. Hell, I even detected cocoa notes. I sometimes have a hard time putting my finger on what I can quantify. Irregular burn is my only complaint.
📜 Archival Review
September 10, 2007
"hall of fame"
This cigar is worthy of all the good reviews listed here. I too have been smoking these things for years and never thought I could pick em up at 72.00 dollars a box. Smoked many different $$$$ cigars, this is still the best.
📜 Archival Review
August 25, 2007
"Value!"
I picked this cigar up because of its ranking in the Top 25 under $6. I was not disappointed. This is a huge cigar, a dark wrapper with some bumps and veins. Pre-light draw was coffee with a little bit of earthiness. When the cigar was lit, it was close to the same. Lots of coffee, with hints of earthiness and a little cocoa. Burn was not bad, needed one or two touchups. Draw was very good. Overall a good cigar and a great value for around $6. I would buy it again.
📜 Archival Review
July 24, 2007
"Uneven burn, but solid cigar"
This cigar lit well from the start, but then began to burn unevenly. The flavor was smooth and consistent throughout with a medium body. However, it continued to burn unevenly and had to be re-lit three times. The draw became tighter at the half way point but opened up for the final third of the cigar. Aside from construction this cigar was very enjoyable.
📜 Archival Review
July 22, 2007
"a classic"
Excellent cigar for the experienced smoker. These sticks are very reasonably priced and it's a very top notch smoke in every aspect. If you've never had one, treat yourself to complete pleasure!!!!!!!!!!!!
📜 Archival Review
June 20, 2007
"a classic"
This cigar is probably the best value for anyones cigar dollar. It is without a doubt a top rate smoke and a cigar that can't be way outdone by any other cigar regardless of price.I have smoke cigars in all price ranges and all in all this cigar is top of the class!!!!
📜 Archival Review
June 19, 2007
"Simply the Best"
Excellent Medium Taste, Burn, Construction. Smokin these babbies for 4 years now, and nothing else compares.
📜 Archival Review
March 25, 2007
"Surprise near the end. Nice cigar."
Beautiful cigar. Mostly medium bodied smoke, creamy with hints of cocoa for the majority of the cigar. By the middle of the cigar, it gets becomes moderately peppery and spicy. At the end, the peppery taste really jumps out at you with hint of leather, and aroma has a hint of what smells kind of like freshly cut lawn, in an interesting way. Draw changes a bit throughout the smoke, and near the middle and end didn't seem to burn as evenly, but not severe enough to take away from the experience.
📜 Archival Review
February 28, 2007
"Slow and easy kick in the pants."
Good looking full-sized cigar with a trouble-free burn. Very flavorful and reasonably complex. Surprising final third; this one grew fuller and stronger the longer I smoked it. Which was great, because with a cigar this size I felt satisfied enough that I held on as long as I wanted to and then let go without any remorse. I agree; it's a reasonably priced classic.
📜 Archival Review
February 25, 2007
"Superb"
The sight of this cigar in my local B&M immediately grabbed my attention. Great appearance, superb construction and nice size (54 x 7.25). I like big ring gauge for the way it feels in my hand and I was looking for a long smoke. Cut and lit perfectly and easily. Medium bodied but not quite as strong as many maduros. Creamy and smooth all the way to the end with even burn, nice ash and great smoke output for the entire 7.25 inches. Left me with a great aftertaste (but not too much) that I wish many cigars would have. A great cigar plain and simple.
I think I'll have to pick up a box of these. They are definitely in my "to smoke again" category and highly recommended.
I think I'll have to pick up a box of these. They are definitely in my "to smoke again" category and highly recommended.
📜 Archival Review
January 5, 2007
"a classic"
This cigar is an astounding smoke that I highly recommend to someone looking for a much pleasurable smoking experience. I'm another smoker who enjoys these on a regular basis. Everything about this cigar is top rate!!!!!!!
📜 Archival Review
November 30, 2006
"a classic!"
This was my first real cigar when i started years and years ago, and it's just as good now.
Beautiful cigar, very nice draw, burn was very good (they used to have big problems with this years ago, but seem to have corrected it).
Lots of spice, mainly white and black pepper, full-bodied, nutty, some cocoa.
First class
Beautiful cigar, very nice draw, burn was very good (they used to have big problems with this years ago, but seem to have corrected it).
Lots of spice, mainly white and black pepper, full-bodied, nutty, some cocoa.
First class
📜 Archival Review
November 6, 2006
"The Real Deal"
Excellent medium bodied cigar. Excellent in every way. I would recommend these cigars to anyone, new cigar smoker or ever day Cuban smoker. Neither would be disappointed. These are always in my humidor.
📜 Archival Review
October 18, 2006
"Very smooth gentle giant"
Large cigar thats very easy on the senses. I love how it does not overwhelm and yet produces wonderful undertones and very pleasant flavors. Very affordable stick for its size
📜 Archival Review
October 17, 2006
"a great cigar"
WOW!!!!!!!!!!! It just doesn't get any better. I smoke these on a very regular basis and they rarely, and I mean really let me down. Lets call it "cigar heaven". I have smoked well over 50 different cigar brands and so many different sizes and this one still stands out. I think I'll go and smoke one now!!!
📜 Archival Review
October 8, 2006
"A Favorite Smoke !"
Excellent smoke for the money! Great taste that stays consistent to the end. Will compete with higher end sticks. A must stick to have in your humidore.
📜 Archival Review
July 13, 2006
"this is the one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
This cigar is why I keep smoking cigars. If I had to chose one cigar as my favorite regardless of price, this would be it. I have smoked cigars for about 10 years and I've enjoyed over 1,000 of these over that time period-with a total of about 5 that would not draw.That in itself is totally amazing!!! Highly recommended smoke!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
📜 Archival Review
April 8, 2006
"Great Big Stick"
I bought this stick just to try something new. I will be buying more for the humidor. The construction was good, although the draw was a little tight, it did not prevent enjoyment of this cigar. The taste was spicey with a small amount of leather on the finish. Overall, this is a good smoke and can only get better with some age.
📜 Archival Review
December 16, 2005
"Well Rested and Very Smooth"
I have a box of these that has been aging about 3 years. Smoked one yesterday afternoon/evening and with my eyes closed thought I was into a Padron Anniversario in Maduro. Smooth, chocolatey. A fine cigar. A 3 beer cigar. Didn't take it too the nub as it got too cold out! Highly recommended but start early in the day when it is warmer.
📜 Archival Review
October 9, 2005
"an all around alright smoke."
a very good burn, even and bright, slow and steady. a good draw with an interesting taste, dont know how to describe it though. the construction was also good.
📜 Archival Review
June 5, 2005
"One of my favorites"
This looks like a cigar that means business and it does. Lights good and burns good had 4 inch and a half plus ashes in the tray. A little tight on the draw but not too bad. Great flavor all the way through, when I first started I thought it was going to kick my butt but it never got to strong. Overall a great smoke and value at $3.75, by the way the length i s 7,25 and the ring size is 54.
📜 Archival Review
April 25, 2005
"Wicked"
I love these. After going through many #1 naturals and being continually satisfied, I tried the maduro. Just as good. A tad bitter, but that's only in comparison to the #1 natural which is the smoothest smoke I've ever had. Perfectly constructed, every time.
📜 Archival Review
April 24, 2005
"Don't let the looks fool you."
This cigar can look a bit intimidating, but don't let the looks fool you; It's a sweetheart of a smoke all the way through. It looks a bit overpowering but is really very smooth and quite a bit milder than one might expect. It has lots of flavor and never dissapoints.
📜 Archival Review
February 23, 2005
"Good Every Day Smoke"
This is a great every day stick. Well constructed, good draw and plenty of flavor. Very consistant.
📜 Archival Review
February 1, 2005
"Another good but not great"
This one has a nice medium flavor of toastiness, with highlights of cocoa and chocolate. Although it had an excellent burn overall, several pieces did the exact same thing at about 3.5"....the flavor fell apart and turned mild and bland. With some better flavor consistency in the second half these would be outstanding.
📜 Archival Review
September 14, 2004
"Good but not great"
Ive had the #3 Maduro and it was a treat, expected similar experience from this big beauty. Good looking cigar that burned well so construction was up to par, the flavor and aroma were not though. A good cigar, aroma just did not grab my attention
📜 Archival Review
July 22, 2004
"Tasty ...."
I've had a couple in the past 2 weeks. They draw perfectly. Mild-medium taste but smooth and not harsh. Burn straight all the way down and I nub these. Wonderful with a hoppy pale ale.
📜 Archival Review
May 29, 2004
"A great cigar"
I love these stogies. It has a medium to full flavor which is always consistent. However, Once a had one that was slightly disfigured, but they can not always be perfect.
📜 Archival Review
April 16, 2004
"EXCELLENT"
I have had about 10 of these to date, and they have to be one of the best buys out there. Medium to fuller taste, never harsh, always burn great.
📜 Archival Review
January 25, 2004
"one of the best non-cubans"
This cigar is heaven!
📜 Archival Review
December 1, 2003
"hdm ex. I m"
This cigar was ok. the flavor definitly can be discribed as toasty and a little woody. The flavor stayed the same through out most of the cigar which for my taste kinda lost my interest. still is a pretty good smoke though.
📜 Archival Review
August 18, 2003
"Can't go wrong!"
I really like these cigars. Medium strength with nice leathery toasty wood flavors. I do think they are a little too soft and they burn pretty quick. Overall a real nice smoke!
📜 Archival Review
August 11, 2003
"Not too bad"
Very smooth, nice construction and burn and plenty of smoke. But the flavor and taste are not so rich nor deep. Maybe a good golfing cigar.
📜 Archival Review
August 3, 2003
"used to be a fan"
I used to be a fan of this one, but at least the one I had this weekend was poor. It burned poorly, started bitter, never developed any character and after a while, I just gave up on it because it was not enjoyable. Too bad, I really like other HDM cigars.
📜 Archival Review
June 10, 2003
"Excalibur Excels"
Beautiful appearance, solid construction, consistent throughout. Firm and very even draw, lasts forever. Initially mild, develops into medium to full-bodied with notes of wood, nuts, and a hint of "sweet earth". Very smooth. There are a few (not many) better cigars, but no better value.
📜 Archival Review
June 4, 2003
"Excalibur"
Exceptional every time. This is one fine smoke.
📜 Archival Review
May 17, 2003
"Good Solid Cigar"
Started out mild, then got a bit better. Hot at the end. Not as great as the other HDM series I've had, but good all around.
📜 Archival Review
May 13, 2003
"Great golf cigar"
Had it while playing golf and it lasted nine holes, wow. Started a little mild but got better as it went. Went from mild to medium. Nice burn and draw. Very good value. A nice creamy beginning that ended with a smooth medium taste.
📜 Archival Review
April 10, 2003
"suprise!!!!!"
Lit up this big boy and was surprised by the wonderful flavors and how smooth it was. I fell in love
📜 Archival Review
April 5, 2003
"Excalibur=Excellente"
Smooth, medium bodied smoke, rich with notes of coffee. Draw and burn were both excellent and she burned nice and slow. Construction was beautiful as well. A very pleasant maduro, especially for $6.00. Great after a meal!
📜 Archival Review
January 16, 2003
"cocoa flavor"
Medium-bodied smoke, with strong cocoa flavors. The wrapper had some stretch marks, but the oily sheen and smoothness balanced that out. Always performs well.
📜 Archival Review
October 27, 2002
"BIG..."
BIG STICK
BIG SMOKE PLUMES
BIG TASTE, SPICE, MELLOW, COCO...
BIG BANG
BIG FUN!
BIG SMOKE PLUMES
BIG TASTE, SPICE, MELLOW, COCO...
BIG BANG
BIG FUN!
📜 Archival Review
October 22, 2002
"untouched value"
One of the fine true tobacco flavors. A "discovery!"
📜 Archival Review
August 18, 2002
"The older the better"
I aged one of these for about 2 years and i have to say, it was one of the best smokes i've ever had. made the cigar taste like 10x its price!
📜 Archival Review
August 16, 2002
"Pleasant surprise"
I'm so use to bigger cigars that this one suprised me. I was shocked when I lit this one up, and was enjoying it. A very pleasent suprise.
📜 Archival Review
July 19, 2002
"Excalibur #1 - Maduro"
One of the finer cigars available for the money.
Always keeps some in my humidor.
Always keeps some in my humidor.
📜 Archival Review
June 3, 2002
"Great Smoke, Great Value"
I wish I had discovered this one sooner: superior construction that results in massive billows of smooth, rich smoke. Plus, this cigar is inexpensive and widely available. Kudos to Hoyo de Monterrey.
📜 Archival Review
March 25, 2001
Always and forever a great smoke. Excellent taste, perfect construction and a dark oily wrapper never lets you down.
📜 Archival Review
July 12, 2000
big, full-bodied & flavorful maduro
an exceptional value
an exceptional value
📜 Archival Review
June 21, 2000
A great smoke every time. I only wish I had the money to buy them a box at a time.
📜 Archival Review
March 14, 2000
awesome
📜 Archival Review
March 5, 2000
A smooth buy spicy long lasting smoke. The draw was perhaps a little to easy. I'll definitely smoke more of them.
📜 Archival Review
January 19, 2000
Always, always, always a great cigar!
📜 Archival Review
November 21, 1999
An exeptional smoke for the cost. No bouble digit cost. Beautiful begining with a gorgeous end.
📜 Archival Review
August 28, 1999
I have been enjoying these cigars for over 2 years. This month ( Aug./99) I bought a box and have found them to be exceptional.
📜 Archival Review
August 25, 1999
Very robust flavors yet mild and very smooth draw. This is consistently the best cigar I smoke.
📜 Archival Review
February 22, 1999
A totally enjoyable experience but make sure you have an hour and a half to enjoy this one
📜 Archival Review
February 8, 1999
Wonderful cigar. Have smoked six now, and every one was a delight. Nice complex flavors that change as the cigar burns down, which helps break the time--this baby takes a long time to smoke.
📜 Archival Review
April 9, 1998
Flavor and aroma redolent of chocolate, nuts with greater intensity than any other cigar I have tried. Takes 1.5 hours to smoke. Heads and shoulders above competition
📜 Archival Review
December 8, 1997
This had a nice oily shien to it. It had many flavors including coffe and some nuttiness.very rich but not to strong
📜 Archival Review
August 20, 1997
This was a great smoking experience. High quality in burn and taste. A beautiful cigar that went great with Scotch.
Add Your Review
Share your experience with this cigar. All reviews are moderated before appearing on the site.