Cigar Specifications
Brand / Line:
Partagas (Cuba)
Cigar Name:
Mille Fleurs
Country of Origin:
Cuba
Size:
42 x 5.125
Wrapper:
Cuba
Filler:
Cuba
Binder:
Cuba
Status:
Active
0 Recent Reviews
None yetNo recent reviews yet — be the first!
17 Archival Reviews
Show ↓📜 Archival Review
March 1, 2026
"Partagas Mille Fleur"
This PC smokes almost as well as the Saint Luis Rey PC at less than half the cost. A great inexpensive Cuban.
📜 Archival Review
December 17, 2007
"a great petit corona"
Nowadays only produced as hand-made and longfiller, but still a good value. Not complex as the more expensive brothers of the brand but still an excellent cigar. The ones I have smoked had all perfect construction and draw. Medium body, nice earthy and beany flavours, mostly sweet with just a bit of spice.
📜 Archival Review
May 8, 2007
"Top of the line"
Best value smoke. Great cigar. Top 5 for me. Flavor is top shelf.
📜 Archival Review
September 28, 2006
"Much better..."
..than the last one I had last year. This one was actually quite good. It started off with some tangy hay and alfalfa flavors and got stronger as it went. By the middle section, flavors included coffee, leather and tobacco. There was a little spiciness to it at times and a rough edge every now and then - that paper bag taste that is somewhat common to Partagas smokes, but it never became unpleasant. I was surprised to like this after having such a bad experience with the first one I tried. Now I regret having giving several of them away. I still have one left, so I'll fire it up in another year and hope for even more improvement!
📜 Archival Review
January 3, 2006
"smoke for fun"
the draw is tight. little smoke to taste. no distinct flavour. body is quite hard. but solid construction. only the box and name is nice.
📜 Archival Review
August 6, 2005
"OK"
Paid out the nose for one in Canada at a local B&M, nice looking, nice construction, taste was good, no killer smoke but a solid small cigar.
📜 Archival Review
July 18, 2005
"cheap, but still not worth it"
This was an inexpensive short smoke, but there are much better options avalaible. The flavor was very grassy with notes of black coffee; quite harsh overall. The draw was also quite tight. Not one I'll be trying again.
📜 Archival Review
March 24, 2004
"Decent full-bodied cigar"
Thick velvet smoke and a sweet after-taste. Full-body turns harsh if smoked too fast.
📜 Archival Review
December 8, 2003
"Hmm!"
Smoke one last night.
Whileit had a nice undertone of Havana flavor, it never got more impressive than that. Actually became a little harsher as it went along.
Still. I'm hoping some age might round out the box a bit.
Whileit had a nice undertone of Havana flavor, it never got more impressive than that. Actually became a little harsher as it went along.
Still. I'm hoping some age might round out the box a bit.
📜 Archival Review
December 7, 2003
"Plain and boring"
There was nothing about this cigar that jumped up and grabbed my attention. The wooddy flavor was refined, but there was never a hint that it would get any better or stronger
📜 Archival Review
November 1, 2003
"nice little cigar"
if you want something small, quick, and flavorful, reach for one of these. it was surprisingly tasty and complex for its size and didnt burn as hot and harshly as i expected.
📜 Archival Review
October 21, 2003
"Surprising"
I was surprised at the flavor packed in thhis little stick. Although it isn't a ring I normally like, I was very pleased. Good construction, and not whimpy on flavor.
📜 Archival Review
September 29, 2003
"good construction, powerful smoke"
the construction on this cigar was pretty darn good considering the price, it started off strong for the first 1/5 of the cigar and then mellowed quiet a bit, not too bad but could probably benefit from some aging
📜 Archival Review
April 27, 2003
"Seriously Average"
... but that's all you're paying for ....
📜 Archival Review
April 14, 2003
"Good and Inexpensive"
This is definitely a great cigar. If you like a spicey cigar that is not overdone then this is the one for you. The only thing I have ever found wrong with these puppies is an occasional tight draw. This is one Cuban you won't need to take a second mortgage to purchase.
📜 Archival Review
March 31, 2003
"Excellent little smoke"
The carmel colored wrapper on this smoke gives off a nice sweet brown sugar scent when toasted although that scent doesn't carry over to the flavor profile. The flavor is bready with a healthy dose of spice which is very refined. The draw was a little bit tight, but the rest of the construction was flawless.
📜 Archival Review
April 21, 2002
"Nice and spicy"
A good alternative to the more expensive pcs, good flavor and a medium finish. Nice and spicy.
Add Your Review
Share your experience with this cigar. All reviews are moderated before appearing on the site.