Cigar Specifications
Brand / Line:
Puros Indios
Cigar Name:
Piramide No. 2
Shape:
Pyramid
Country of Origin:
Honduras
Size:
46 x 6.5
Wrapper:
Ecuador
Filler:
D.R., Nic, Brazil
Binder:
Ecuador
Status:
Active
0 Recent Reviews
None yetNo recent reviews yet — be the first!
15 Archival Reviews
Show ↓📜 Archival Review
March 1, 2026
Simply fantastic, loads of smoke and flavor that makes you smoke it til it burns your lips
📜 Archival Review
March 1, 2026
What can I say, this CIGAR is the bomb. A medium bodied smoke the provides many complex flavors and an aftertaste that makes you not want to brush your teeth prior to bed. I LOVE THIS MOST BEAUTIFUL CIGARRO!!!
📜 Archival Review
March 1, 2026
A big impressive cigar. The draw was tight. It was hard to keep lit. The taste was a little flat, not full bodied as I had expected. Ash and burn was ok. This was my second pyramid #2. I was very disappointed. buzz factor=2
📜 Archival Review
March 1, 2026
it's big, but well worth the time it takes to smoke. i've found them
to be a great fall back for party's because of there mild taste,
almost evry one can handle them without feeling like there being
subjected to a fait worse than death.
to be a great fall back for party's because of there mild taste,
almost evry one can handle them without feeling like there being
subjected to a fait worse than death.
📜 Archival Review
March 1, 2026
A great looking cigar, with a nice oilr-rich wrapper. Can't say enough about the construction.
📜 Archival Review
March 1, 2026
No doubt about it my favorite cigar. Loaded with spices, full flavored, even burning all the way down,
📜 Archival Review
March 1, 2026
Nothing compares to a 1989-90 vintage #2 Puro. Current #2 has dropped off a bit, but still boasts a beautiful silky wrapper.
📜 Archival Review
February 9, 2008
"Nice long smoke"
The cigar has a better looking wrapper than many PI cigars I have smoked. The Natural wrappers are milder than the Maduro versions but I found it flavorful and smooth. Not as complex as many of the PI smokes but I still found it enjoyable. The ash was a nice light gray and was over an inch long before it would come off. A good value for the money, and a long smoke, it is highly recommended.
📜 Archival Review
May 13, 2007
"very very bland and boring"
Beautiful looking cigar. It looks very well made. Lite perfectly and the draw and burn through out was excellent.
Here is the problem is lack flavor of any kind. The is a very mild cigar almost to the point of be boring. According their website this is suppose to be a strong cigar what a joke. May be Puros Indios should some more time aging the tobacco and reblending the cigar. I feel sorry for the cigar roller who did a beautiful job rolling this cigar only to be let down by the tobacco they were given.
Here is the problem is lack flavor of any kind. The is a very mild cigar almost to the point of be boring. According their website this is suppose to be a strong cigar what a joke. May be Puros Indios should some more time aging the tobacco and reblending the cigar. I feel sorry for the cigar roller who did a beautiful job rolling this cigar only to be let down by the tobacco they were given.
📜 Archival Review
April 3, 2006
"can't think of one..."
Good looking. Other than that- average everything: taste, draw, burn and value. I have to say there is something distictive about the taste of a Puros Indios. Can't really put my finger on it- other than a "vegetable" taste. Other than the attractive looks- its a run of the mill premium stick.
📜 Archival Review
April 1, 2005
"Dog Log"
I mean it in the truest sense. These things were putrid. Bought six, and put five and a half of 'em down the garbage disposal. They probably ruined something down there in my septic tank.
📜 Archival Review
March 21, 2005
"Poor Man's Monte #2"
I'm talkin' two nickels, 1 button, and some pocket lint poor. This is a super mild cigar that is wildly inconsistent from a construction standpoint. If the wrapper does not unravel or burn unven than you might find time to enjoy. I purchased a bundle and only 1 cigar was worthy. Luckily the price is sub $3.00.
📜 Archival Review
December 24, 2004
"Boring"
Dull cigar, with not much flavor and smoke. Dull....Dull...Dull.
📜 Archival Review
July 12, 2004
"pleasantly surprised"
This cigar was better than I thought it would be. I was expecting a strong hot smoke, but was milder than I expected with nice burn and flavor.
📜 Archival Review
January 14, 2003
"Fine smoke"
A nice cigar, but tends to burn uneven. Good flavors, but not really complexed enough. Medium-body went well with my Bass Ale.
Add Your Review
Share your experience with this cigar. All reviews are moderated before appearing on the site.