Cigar Specifications
Brand / Line:
Saint Luis Rey (Hon)
Cigar Name:
Toro
Shape:
Toro
Country of Origin:
Honduras
Size:
50 x 6
Filler:
Hon., Nic., Peru
Binder:
Honduras
MSRP:
$3.15
Status:
Active
0 Recent Reviews
None yetNo recent reviews yet — be the first!
16 Archival Reviews
Show ↓📜 Archival Review
March 13, 2026
Woody and Dry. Very nice!
📜 Archival Review
March 13, 2026
This is one of my favorite every day cigars
📜 Archival Review
March 13, 2026
This is a great full-flavored cigar. Very rich tasting.
A great pleasure to smoke. It also has a good aroma,
so it's a good inside cigar.
A great pleasure to smoke. It also has a good aroma,
so it's a good inside cigar.
📜 Archival Review
March 13, 2026
A great cigar; Full-bodied and a great smoke. Easy to draw and stays burning even when getting up to "use the facilities". You'll want to use a roach clip to get every bit of smoke of of this baby!
📜 Archival Review
November 10, 2008
"A Saint"
Just like Simon Templar this cigar delivers, but is a bit secretive about being such a good bargain. This one was in the humidor for over a year and burned like a champ (or a saint if you know your history). The taste was tart with some nuts and cream. Certainly worth the money.
📜 Archival Review
February 25, 2007
"And another one gone"
This smoke is just another cigar. If ya know what I mean. If ya do then you know I mean straight up tabacco flavors and nothing else. It's pretty and very well made but that's it, boring. I've tried a lot of cigars and I only review about 2/3's of em for some reason. Why I picked this one is probably because i'm smoking one now. Won a 5er cheap on C-Bid and this is the last one.It's good for smoking when you busy at home or fishing or something like that. If ya want to sit down and really enjoy a good smoke then pick something else. It's just an ok smoke and that's all.
📜 Archival Review
October 16, 2006
"nice smoke"
good burn, solid construction, smooth draw, taste of creamy wood, BUT not a big burst of flavor.
📜 Archival Review
July 23, 2006
"Not bad."
For the most part, this cigar had pretty good flavor--one dimensional, not very strong, but pleasing. It got a little bitter toward the end and required a number of relights.
📜 Archival Review
May 21, 2006
"an enjoyable smoke"
Nice elastic smooth shiny wrapper, looked like the review cigar photos in Cigar Magazine. Lights up nicely. burns evenly. Tastes pleasant but not exciting. the flavor grows on you though a classic old fassioned cigar taste. Nice afternoon smoke with your favorite coffee. Truly a medium - full cigar.
📜 Archival Review
May 7, 2006
"Killer Value"
A fantastic smoke that lives up to the hype for the most part. It's extremely attractive with a tremendous complex flavor profile. This one burned unevenly, but only minimally affected the overall experience.
📜 Archival Review
March 6, 2005
"No POP"
This stick had no pop to it, appearance was nice and construction was very good but there was no notes to wow you. This was a very big let down.
📜 Archival Review
July 15, 2003
"WHAT HAVE THEY DONE?!!!!"
bACK IN 1996 - 1997 THIS WAS ONE OF MY FAVORITE SMOKES. RELIABLY STRONG AND WELL CONSTRUCTED. THEN they messed with the packaging and the blend of tobacco(s). I smoked one of these from two separate brand new boxes recently and I didn't recognize this cigar. It looked great, but it was like smoking unflavored air. Major disappointment. I hear they are going to mess with this brand again soon. Please fix this stick!!!!!!!!
📜 Archival Review
May 8, 2003
"San Luis Rey series A"
Flavor ok
Rolled to tight - draw less than acceptable
Rolled to tight - draw less than acceptable
📜 Archival Review
April 27, 2003
"90+ for less than $5"
I hope this stick was just a lemon, because I was expecting a great smoke. The draw was tight, the burn extremely uneven, and the flavor was average. I may try again later, but I cannot recommend this cigar.
📜 Archival Review
March 20, 2003
"Solid Everyday Smoke"
Good construction, medium woody flavor, a fine choice for a "non special occassion" smoke. Got these at JR on closeout, an absolute steal.
📜 Archival Review
March 18, 2003
"Very Good"
This is a very reliable cigar. I've smoked several, and the construction is consistent. Flavor is quite smooth, medium body.
Add Your Review
Share your experience with this cigar. All reviews are moderated before appearing on the site.