Cigar Specifications
Brand / Line:
Sancho Panza (Hon)
Cigar Name:
Primoroso
Shape:
Churchill
Country of Origin:
Honduras
Size:
47 x 6.75
Filler:
D.R., Hon, Nic
Status:
Active
0 Recent Reviews
None yetNo recent reviews yet — be the first!
13 Archival Reviews
Show ↓📜 Archival Review
March 13, 2026
VERY over-rated...spend your money on something else
📜 Archival Review
March 20, 2007
"Ended with an Ugh..."
While the cigar started off with a nice clean taste, as it burned, the worse the flavor became. Near the end of the stick, it was a struggle to even puff in anticipation of the dank, rotting wood taste that would be left in my mouth. Didn't even get a consistent burn. not much to compliment this baby on.
📜 Archival Review
February 25, 2007
"Great Smoke"
This guy was aged and had a symphany of flavors. Coffee, leather and spice with great construction.
📜 Archival Review
August 5, 2006
"GROSS OUT"
This sucker was so bitter... hardly able to get 1/2 way through. Maybe ageing is needed? Or maybe this line just stinks. Was stored properly in my humi for 2 months... thank goodness I didn't purchase more than 1.
📜 Archival Review
March 27, 2006
"Bad news overall..."
Draw and burn were good. And that's about where the positives end. The taste was very one-dimensional, and that dimension wasn't very good. Kinda grassy; not too pleasant. Frankly, I'd rather smoke Black and Milds. Nothing compared to a Torano for a similar price, or even a Kelner 3X3 bundle Churchill for much less.
📜 Archival Review
January 22, 2005
"chewy churchill"
This stick if left to sit in your humidor for some time will be a very lovely smoke. The notes were of cedar and coffee, the foot lit well and held its ash well. I took this churchill all the way to its nub, it pays some times to let a cigar age. Just a chewy churchill.
📜 Archival Review
September 26, 2004
"Disappointing"
Oddly enough I tried this cigar out after having a good experience with another cigar in the Sancho Panza line. I did not enjoy this cigar. It was well constructed however it had an acrid ashy taste to it and I struggled to make it through to the end. However, never one to give up so easily I tried a second one thinking it could have been operator error 🙂 Yet same as before it started off harsh and continued to taste bitter until I was about half way through. Needless to say its one of the only cigars I have ever stopped smoking halfway through because of taste. Sorry, don't waste the money.
📜 Archival Review
March 11, 2004
"Ewww."
I found these babies at the shop I go to at an amazing $2.99 a stick. I was hoping it would be good enough for at least an every day smoke. Afterall, I had read a good deal of good stuff about it. This cigar was bitter all the way. It's a nice looking cigar, and I like the plain look of the label. Bitter, bitter, bitter. Not complex, not flavorful, just bitter. I wouldn't suggest this cigar to anyone...especially a first-timer. It will turn them off to cigars all together.
📜 Archival Review
January 4, 2004
"middle of the road"
tends to be bitter to start off. eventually settled into a one dimensional peppery flavor. nothing great, but it didnt make me gag. the double maduros are a much better buy
📜 Archival Review
December 6, 2003
"Good medium cigar"
Because of the previous reviews I waited till I had smoked at least five of these before passing judgement. This cigar was firm slightly boxed shape that had a mild, flavor when lit and developed into cinnamon-spice flavors midway and a medium-rich woody finish.
This isis a nice medium body cigar, but basically a one dimensional smoke. I still enjoyed smoking them and would recommend to both new and seasoned smokers.
This isis a nice medium body cigar, but basically a one dimensional smoke. I still enjoyed smoking them and would recommend to both new and seasoned smokers.
📜 Archival Review
December 7, 2002
"Ewww."
I found these babies at the shop I go to at an amazing $2.99 a stick. I was hoping it would be good enough for at least an every day smoke. Afterall, I had read a good deal of good stuff about it. This cigar was bitter all the way. It's a nice looking cigar, and I like the plain look of the label. Bitter, bitter, bitter. Not complex, not flavorful, just bitter. I wouldn't suggest this cigar to anyone...especially a first-timer. It will turn them off to cigars all together.
📜 Archival Review
August 3, 2002
"decent stick"
Wasn't my favorite at first, but mellows out to be a decent stick. First couple of puffs bring a bite.
📜 Archival Review
July 2, 2002
"Very Bad"
Swisher Sweets are better than this cigar.
Add Your Review
Share your experience with this cigar. All reviews are moderated before appearing on the site.