Cigar Specifications
Brand / Line:
Trilogy
Cigar Name:
Cameroon Churchill
Shape:
Churchill
Country of Origin:
Honduras
Wrapper:
Cameroon
Binder:
Honduras
Status:
Active
0 Recent Reviews
None yetNo recent reviews yet — be the first!
10 Archival Reviews
Show ↓📜 Archival Review
January 18, 2008
"Thrillogy?"
I'm amazed at how different various cameroon wrappers can taste. This cigar has a nice flavor, but not as spicy as most cameroons. I like this blend, best as a robusto because after 45 min. the one dimensional flavor begins to lose it's charm. I don't mean that this is not a good cigar, it certainly is, but doesn't go too much beyond that.
📜 Archival Review
February 20, 2007
"All-Time Favorite"
I love most all cigars with Cameroon wrappers. But this is my All-Time Favorite. I really like the tri-pressed, the conventional round is equally enjoyable.
📜 Archival Review
January 13, 2007
"Funny shape"
Tri press, now that kind of odd to say the least. But I don't smoke cigars for shape so it doesn't matter. It does feel kind of strange in you hand though. I do enjoy the flavor of this smoke, very cameroonie lol. It's a good smoke with pretty good construction and burn, heald a great ash too. Overall a decent smoke.
📜 Archival Review
December 17, 2006
"Another a.m. smoke."
Very mild with leather and coffee. I knew exactly what I was getting and I know to not smoke this one later than noon. An occasional sweet vanilla note pops up. I don't care for the tri-press but it doesn't really take away from the enjoyment. The medium gray ash is safe for an inch or so, the burn is good and the draw is firm. The flavor becomes more prominent approaching halfway the body staying mild and no bite. Pick up a few for under $1.50 on c-bid and try for yourself.
📜 Archival Review
November 12, 2006
"Solid cigar"
Very well made medium cigar, burn and draw were above average, with a solid Cameroon taste. But I'll agree there isn't much depth.
📜 Archival Review
August 11, 2006
"Nice but wanted more"
Longest ash I ever gotten on a cigar. Looked cool, burned great but I kept waiting for some complexity and flavor to this smoke. Never got there.
📜 Archival Review
November 4, 2004
"o.k. cigar"
I found this cigar, after a few smoked, to be middle of the road. I expected a more full bodied smoke, but it is definitely medium. Nice cameroon spice, but not alot of depth.
📜 Archival Review
June 18, 2004
"boring cigar"
i would not recommend this one aor any of the Alec Bradley cigars. very bland no complexity tasted machine made take a pass.
📜 Archival Review
March 19, 2004
"Disappointment"
The right price (3.95). Gorgeous wrapper. Unique shape. Perfect draw. Perfect construction. Perfect burn. Unfortunately, there is so much more to a cigar than aesthetics. This cigar tasted sooooo disappointingly plain. I could not hold the cigar in my mouth as the acrid smoke burned my eyes.
Not to be critical, but Mike...you need to take so much more than "a pull" to get a good feel of a cigar.
I would not suggest this cigar to anyone.
Not to be critical, but Mike...you need to take so much more than "a pull" to get a good feel of a cigar.
I would not suggest this cigar to anyone.
📜 Archival Review
February 26, 2004
"Not bad"
This cigar my friend bought tonight and he really enjoyed it. I took a pull and was impresses. Defianatley one of the best cigars for undre $6.
Add Your Review
Share your experience with this cigar. All reviews are moderated before appearing on the site.