Cigar Specifications
Brand / Line:
Trinidad (D.R.)
Cigar Name:
Churchill
Shape:
Churchill
Country of Origin:
Dominican Republic
Wrapper:
Ecuador
Status:
Active
0 Recent Reviews
None yetNo recent reviews yet — be the first!
10 Archival Reviews
Show ↓📜 Archival Review
October 8, 2008
"Better than I expected"
This cigar screams planet earth. The tastes were of grass, wood and that earthy dirt taste, but in a good way. I enjoyed it. I picked up a 5 pack from Cigarbid.com for $21. Definately worth the $4.25. I don't understand all the ho-hum toward this smoke, either.
📜 Archival Review
March 10, 2007
"Pricey but good"
As many have pointed out, these Dominicans are over priced. And they're not a patch on the Cubans of the same name. But I still think this is a fine Churchy--beautiful construction, perfect burn. The flavors tend toward the earthy and woody and the draw is fab. I got these on a buy 2, get one free deal...and even with a third off, they were in the $ 10 range. Still...
📜 Archival Review
August 19, 2005
"Good but over priced"
Good solid smoking med to full flavored stick. But at $9 bucks a stick? This smoke lacked a finishing quality. NO WAY I buy these at the current prices. I think Trinidad has spent a lot of $ in the marketing of these and included it in the price. Maybe...I'd buy a box if they were 1/2 the price. Maybe.
📜 Archival Review
March 15, 2005
"Needs aging?"
Wife bought me a box for Christmas. Great gift, good cigar. For the money this cigar lacks depth, it has subtle flavor, excellent construction, and a nice draw. I plan on letting these age for a couple more months to see what happens.
📜 Archival Review
May 5, 2004
"Hype-Schmype"
Is an acceptable $3.00 'gar. But I can buy good $3.00 'gars for $1.50, so why spend $10+? This brand has been hyped as much as 'The Flintstones' movie was, and is as good!
📜 Archival Review
March 11, 2004
"Awwww...man"
I really wanted to smoke this. They have gorgeous ads in the magazines...especially Cigar Aficianado. It was a nice looking cigar...no doubt. Lit great...smoked very nicely...taste was just ok. 🙁 VERY disappointing. I get better from my $4 and $5 smokes.
📜 Archival Review
March 2, 2004
"not impressed"
I bought this cigar thinking that it would be amazing, but it really was nothing special. Sure it was beautiful and smoked well, but the flavor was lacking and for almost $10, I wouldn't buy this cigar again.
📜 Archival Review
December 21, 2003
"Not man enough"
Looks beautiful though, just so peppery and no depth. One dimensional. Not much flavor. Similar to La Flor Ligeros. Not my cup of tea.
📜 Archival Review
September 16, 2003
"No Complaints"
Can't find a thing wrong with this. Has a special taste all it's own in my opinion, which I like. Will keep a box on hand.
📜 Archival Review
May 7, 2003
"Like a Monte DR"
This reminds me a lot of the Montecristos from the Dominican Republic: impeccable construction, decent flavor, but young and overpriced.
Add Your Review
Share your experience with this cigar. All reviews are moderated before appearing on the site.